Thoughts on General and Partial Inoculations: Containing a translation of two treatises written when the author was at Petersburg, and published there, by Command of her Imperial Majesty, in the Russian LanguageDimsdale, Thomas
History
Thoughts on General and Partial Inoculations: Containing a translation of two treatises written when the author was at Petersburg, and published there, by Command of her Imperial Majesty, in the Russian Language
Dimsdale, Thomas
Smallpox -- Vaccination -- Early works to 1800
From the time that Inoculation was introduced into this country one may
date the opposition to its practice; many learned and ingenious men soon
entered the field against it, and were encountered by others of equal
abilities in its defence. The questions were warmly agitated, and in a
short time foreigners of great name became authors on both sides. But
the strength of argument on the part of the defenders of Inoculation,
supported by the good success of the practice, hath almost silenced
opposition; and the concurrence of the courts of Petersburg, Vienna, and
France, who have submitted to the operation, and by their illustrious
examples encouraged its progress in their dominions, will probably close
the dispute in its favour.
One objection alone seems not to have been satisfactorily removed,
which, although it does not relate to the safety or health of the
patient, is yet of great importance to the community, and well deserves
the most attentive consideration.
You have, say the objectors, produced accurate and satisfactory accounts
and calculations of the alarming proportion of deaths that happen from
the natural Small Pox, and also proved, that the loss sustained under
Inoculation is inconsiderable. But admitting what you have advanced to
be true, whence comes it that the same Bills of Mortality to which you
appeal, prove also a certain increase instead of a diminution of deaths
from the Small Pox, and that for such a series of years as to leave no
room to dispute the fact? does it not naturally follow, that though
almost the whole number of the inoculated recover, the disease must have
been spread by their means, and a greater proportion having taken the
natural disease, a consequent greater loss has been sustained by the
public? If the above is admitted, it will be difficult to exculpate
Inoculation from having been hurtful to society[2].
-----
Footnote 2:
Extract from the Bills of Mortality, and a continuation of the
estimate from page 19.
│ Total of │ Small │ Under 2 │
│ Deaths. │ Pox. │ Years. │
──────┼──────────┼───────┼─────────┼────────────────────────
1768 │ 23639 │ 3028 │ 8229 │ Total Deaths 178807
69 │ 21847 │ 1968 │ 8016 │ Under 2 Years 63056
70 │ 22434 │ 1986 │ 7994 │ ──────
71 │ 21780 │ 1660 │ 7617 │ 18821) 115751 (6
72 │ 26053 │ 3992 │ 9112 │ 2825
73 │ 21656 │ 1039 │ 6850 │
74 │ 20884 │ 2479 │ 7742 │
75 │ 20514 │ 2669 │ 7496 │
├──────────┼───────┼─────────┼────────────────────────
│ 178807 │ 18821 │ 63056 │ Totals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account