Thoughts on General and Partial Inoculations: Containing a translation of two treatises written when the author was at Petersburg, and published there, by Command of her Imperial Majesty, in the Russian LanguageDimsdale, Thomas
History
Thoughts on General and Partial Inoculations: Containing a translation of two treatises written when the author was at Petersburg, and published there, by Command of her Imperial Majesty, in the Russian Language
Dimsdale, Thomas
Smallpox -- Vaccination -- Early works to 1800
A licence or exclusive permission ought to be granted to such physicians
or surgeons as undertake to inoculate for the Small Pox; for the
mischief arising from the practice of inoculation by the illiterate and
ignorant is beyond conception[1]. Such persons, instead of confining the
infection within narrow limits, too often, through want of skill or
honesty, are the means of propagating it, to the great terror of many
people, the fatal consequences of which, and the destructive tokens,
remain in many places in England. For besides the dreadful mortality
which the disease itself has occasioned, it has often proved the source
of discord and contention among neighbours, and disturbed that harmony
and friendship which had before subsisted among the inhabitants.
-----
Footnote 1:
To enumerate the instances that have happened within my own knowledge
to confirm this assertion, would be almost endless; I shall only
mention a few that are remarkable.
I was desired to visit a young woman about ten miles distant; I found
her dying from the inoculation of a man, who, upon the credit of
having been my coachman, had set up inoculator: he was gone on the
pretence of procuring my assistance, but in fact had ran away; this
was his thirteenth patient.
Another illiterate person in my neighbourhood began the practice; but
a child he had inoculated happening to have a fit, he was so frighted
as to elope till he was informed that his patient was out of danger.
I received a letter from a poor man who kept a school about eight
miles from Hertford, to inform me, that not being able to pay a proper
person, he had ventured to inoculate his own family himself, and
begging a visit on account of one of his children who he feared was in
danger: I complied with his request, and found one child dying of a
confluent pock; but my compassion abated, on finding his house filled
with some poor neighbours from whom he received a small gratuity for
their inoculation, one of which had lost an eye under his care. This
man’s residence was in a small town, and from his patients several
caught the Small Pox, and some died.
I saw a poor woman dying of a confluent disease; her husband had
raised money for his own inoculation, and having had the disease
favourably, was assured by a farmer who inoculated him, that he might
safely go home to his family. The wife died, leaving five children,
who all had the disease and recovered.
At a village not far from Hertford, the same farmer inoculated as many
of the parish as could raise five shillings and three-pence, informing
the others that the Small Pox was not catching from the inoculated;
but the whole neighbourhood became infected, and several died.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account