Thoughts on Slavery and Cheap Sugar: A Letter to the Members and Friends of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery SocietyRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
Thoughts on Slavery and Cheap Sugar: A Letter to the Members and Friends of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Slave trade; Slavery; Sugar trade
To those who are really in earnest in the cry against slave-grown
produce, we say, that it is abundantly proved that the West Indian
monopoly tends directly to keep up slavery. If that were abolished, we
might expect to see slavery destroyed. The monopoly enables the West
Indian planter to pay an unreasonably high price for labour, in
consequence of which there is an importation of labour into the market—an
unnatural demand is created. The high price the West Indian planter gets
for his sugar, makes it answer his purpose to pay more for hire than his
rivals can, and the consequence is, that the neighbouring European
colonists are afraid to emancipate their slaves, knowing well, that
directly they would leave them for the monopoly market, and they would be
left without a hand to till the soil. For instance, we give the
following case:—A large slave-owner, in Dutch Guiana, thus addressed the
editor of the _Economist_, when that gentleman was at Amsterdam. “We
should be glad,” said he, “to follow your example, and emancipate our
slaves, if it were possible; but as long as your differential duties are
maintained it will be impossible. Here is an account-sale of sugar
produced in our colony, netting a return of £11 per hogshead to the
planter in Surinam; and here is an account-sale of similar sugar sold in
London, netting a return of £33 to the planter in Demerara; the
difference ascribable only to your differential duty. The fields of
these two classes of planters are separated only by a few ditches. Now,
such is the effort made by the planter in Demerara to extend his
cultivation, to secure the high price of £33, that he is importing free
labourers from the hills of Hindostan, and from the coast of Africa, at
great cost; and is willing to pay higher prices than even labour will
command in Europe. Let us then emancipate our slaves, which, if it had
any effect, would confer the privilege of the choice of employer, and
Dutch Guiana would be depopulated in a day—an easy means of increasing
the supply of labour to the planters of Demerara, at the cost of entire
annihilation of the cultivation of the estates in Surinam. But abandon
your differential duties; give us the same price for our produce, and
thus enable us to pay the same rate of wages, and I, for one, will not
object to liberate my slaves to-morrow.” {38}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account