Thoughts on Slavery and Cheap Sugar: A Letter to the Members and Friends of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery SocietyRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
Thoughts on Slavery and Cheap Sugar: A Letter to the Members and Friends of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Slave trade; Slavery; Sugar trade
So far so good. Whatever imperfections may have attended it, it was a
noble act—one of which we may well be proud; on the part of the many, it
was done in sincerity and truth. The enlightened people of England
considered it almost as a boon to themselves. There was joy and
rejoicing at home as well as in the green islands of the west. When the
morning dawned on which the slave, the black, stepped forth unchained and
free, praise and thanksgivings burst from the lips of others than the
long-oppressed descendants of Ham. It was the triumph of humanity; and
man, wherever he lived, and whatever his lot, could well be glad.
Years have passed, and the people of England have not as yet reaped the
benefit to which they were fairly entitled by the sacrifices they made.
There is a monopoly in favour of West India produce, which deprives the
working man of this country of an essential article of food. Slavery
still remains, and, till that monopoly is abolished, will remain. Our
abolition of it was regarded as an experiment by slave-holding states—an
experiment which they now consider to have entirely failed. It is quite
natural they should arrive at such a conclusion. What we have done has
been but little. We have merely withdrawn from the slave-market our
demand for slaves. It remains for us to show, that economically as well
as morally we have made a change for the better; that the labour of free
men is more productive than that of slaves. By keeping up our monopoly
we practically declare the reverse. We supply the slave-holder with his
strongest arguments against abolition; and, by giving him an advantage
over us in the markets of the world, we afford a stimulus to slavery
itself; and thus commit what we profess to abhor. Slave-owners are not
remarkable for a high moral sense; could we show them that it was for
their interest to emancipate their slaves, they would not be long ere
they became our converts. As it is, we appeal to them in vain. To the
voice of the charmer they are deaf. Even Lord Brougham’s silvery tones
and gentle pleadings fail to move and win; nor does Joseph Sturge meet
with a better fate.
Slavery is a tremendous ill—an unmitigated curse; earth cannot produce
its equal. Where it rears its hideous head, all that raises man above
the beast, and makes life a thing to be desired, languishes and dies.
Its state is dark as night—dreary as death—terrible as hell. For putting
it down two plans have been proposed. It can be destroyed, it is said,
by government interference, by treaties, by armed power. This has been
tried; we shall now see with what effect. As soon as, in 1807,
Parliament had passed a bill abolishing the British slave trade, by doing
which we but did what was done in Denmark in 1792, the British ministers
at all foreign courts were ordered to negotiate treaties for the
abolition of the slave-trade. Mr. Laird tells us—{11}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account