To those of us who hold this view of the past history of the English
race, of its present position and of the characteristic which
constitutes its peculiarity and strength among the peoples of earth,
the upas-tree theory with regard to its future growth is not only
inconceivable but, could we conceive it as possible, we should hold it
undesirable. And there is nothing from our point of view either in its
past history or present condition to support the theory. The Spaniard
attempted the upas-tree form of colonization and empire, but he has
not succeeded. No nation who has produced any approach to a permanent
organization has followed that line and succeeded by following it. The
Roman, the Great Mogul, attempted, where they conquered, to spread the
benefits and rights of their own organization to the affiliated people;
it was not the number of her slaughters that made the Roman Empire
the greatest the world has yet seen or her rule the most enduring;
the conquests of Rome, when she had attained her widest empire, had
not cost so many lives as many a barbarian conquest which depopulated
whole territories and passed like a smoke or a pestilence leaving no
mark behind; the Roman Empire attained to that endurance and power
it held because Rome was not a upas-tree to the races she came into
contact with, but because, if in a partial and incomplete manner,
yet more than others, where she planted her standard, she sought to
raise and instruct, not to exterminate. No one can study the history
of that great folk in imperial growth without feeling that behind all
lay a dim perception of something higher than mere national expansion;
and in those wise methods, which in the hour of her greatness she
ordained, through which men of all nations and creeds might in time
and by merit become Romans and by her medium spread everywhere the
arts, the knowledge and the advantages peculiar to herself, we see the
germ of the true idea of universal empire fitfully trying to incarnate
itself. Rome fell because she herself became corrupted by wealth and
the inequality of possession, but it took her three centuries to die,
and it must never be forgotten that there were Gauls, Spaniards,
Asiatics and Germans who fought as desperately in her cause at last as
the children of the Seven Hills: so real a fact had been her empire,
so true was her absorption of all peoples into herself. The Gaul, the
Thracian, the Illyrian died generation after generation fighting for
the Roman flag because it had conferred on them something that they
valued, and rather than lose which they would die. It is not because
she slaughtered but because she raised, not because she crushed but
because she protected, that Rome reigned; and she is to some extent
immortal and among us to-day still, not because of the men she
slaughtered, which any savage or wild beast might have accomplished as
well, but because she had something new and large to teach mankind, and
she taught it to the race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account