Thoughts on the Proposed Inclosure of Waltham (commonly called Epping) and Hainault Forests: In which a new plan is suggested for disafforesting the same: with the heads of the bill now proposed for that purposeStreet, Thomas
History
Thoughts on the Proposed Inclosure of Waltham (commonly called Epping) and Hainault Forests: In which a new plan is suggested for disafforesting the same: with the heads of the bill now proposed for that purpose
Transcribed from the 1818 edition by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org
SECOND EDITION.
THOUGHTS
ON THE
PROPOSED INCLOSURE
OF
WALTHAM
(COMMONLY CALLED EPPING)
AND
HAINAULT FORESTS;
IN WHICH
A NEW PLAN
IS SUGGESTED
FOR DISAFFORESTING THE SAME:
WITH
_The Heads of the Bill now proposed for that Purpose_.
* * * * *
“Is not the separate Property of a Thing the great Cause of its
endearment? Does any one respect a Common as much as he does his
Garden?”
SOUTH.
* * * * *
_BY AN OLD INHABITANT_.
* * * * *
LONDON:
PUBLISHED AND SOLD BY J. M. RICHARDSON, 23, CORNHILL,
OPPOSITE THE ROYAL EXCHANGE;
And can be had of the Newsmen in the several Parishes of Barking,
Chigwell,
Chinkford, Dagenham, Epping, East Ham, Great Ilford, Little Ilford,
Leyton, Loughton, Lambourne, Nazing, Theydon-Bois, Stapleford-Abbot,
Stratford, West Ham, Wanstead, Walthamstow, Waltham Holy Cross,
Woodford; and of Messrs. Chalk and Meggy, Chelmsford.
1818.
[_Price One Shilling_.]
* * * * *
TO THE
LORDS OF MANORS,
FREEHOLDERS, COPYHOLDERS,
AND OTHER
OWNERS OF LANDED PROPERTY,
SITUATE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF
_Waltham and Hainault Forests_.
_GENTLEMEN_,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account