Thoughts on the Proposed Inclosure of Waltham (commonly called Epping) and Hainault Forests: In which a new plan is suggested for disafforesting the same: with the heads of the bill now proposed for that purposeStreet, Thomas
History
Thoughts on the Proposed Inclosure of Waltham (commonly called Epping) and Hainault Forests: In which a new plan is suggested for disafforesting the same: with the heads of the bill now proposed for that purpose
A clause was introduced into the Act of the 55th year of his present
Majesty, relative to Crown Lands, whereby the Commissioners of Woods and
Forests were enabled to sell the Rights of the Crown in any small parcels
of land, within any of the Royal Forests, which adjoined or lay
contiguous, or convenient to the lands of individuals, and were of little
value for the growth of timber, or to sell the Rights of the Crown in and
over lands belonging to any of his Majesty’s subjects, lying within the
limits aforesaid;—but the difficulties attending the procuring grants of
land under this power were so great that it has been very little acted
upon.
Whatever useful alterations or amendments in the proposed plan can be
suggested, I have no doubt will meet with a fair and candid investigation
by the Commissioners, and be made the subject of corrections, or
additional clauses, when the Bill is before a Committee of the House of
Commons.
I have heard the question asked by a proprietor of land, in allusion to
the proposed plan, what do the Crown give us in lieu of the 9-32d parts,
or 2810 acres we are to give up? The answer is plain; in the first
place, you give the Crown nothing but what it had a right to before, and
the Commissioners give up all the Rights of the Crown, over the remainder
of the 9000 acres; and one may compare it to the common case of an
agreement between the lord of a manor and the copyholders for an
inclosure and enfranchisement of the whole, would not the lord be fairly
entitled to one-third part, as a satisfaction for the rights he gave up,
and would not the copyholders be remunerated by getting their copyholds
converted to freeholds, and their commons to valuable inclosures; and, in
this case, the remaining 23-32d parts, or 6190 acres, being discharged
from the Rights of the Crown, may either be enjoyed as common, or may be
inclosed at any future time, if the proprietors of land should agree in
such a measure.—At present, the majority appear to be against a general
inclosure; and, as far as the beauty of the country is at stake, I think
they are right, for that certainly is an object of no small importance in
a district so near the metropolis; but that will not be affected by an
inclosure to the extent only proposed by the intended Bill.
APPENDIX.
Office of Woods, &c.
Whitehall-Place,
30th March, 1818.
SIR,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account