Thrasymachus : $b or, The future of moralsJoad, C. E. M. (Cyril Edwin Mitchinson)
Philosophy
Thrasymachus : $b or, The future of morals
Joad, C. E. M. (Cyril Edwin Mitchinson)
Ethics
In any event the present existence of these tendencies, if tendencies
they be, affords no indication of what they may become in the future.
The fact that the primitive savage could only count on the fingers
of one hand does not invalidate the existence of the multiplication
table, any more than the fact that most women want only one man each
now proves that they will not want more in a hundred years. The use of
the word ‘natural’ begs the question. We acquire those characteristics
which our circumstances and environment demand, and then transmit them
to our children in whom, being inherited, they are termed natural.
But this does not mean that our children will not in due course
develop new characteristics of their own, if a change of circumstances
renders the old ones undesirable. There are signs indeed that the new
characteristics are already beginning to appear. The attitude of
representative up-to-date women on this subject is curious. They tend
to deny the difference between males and females which my imaginary
biologist alleged, and to declare that their inclinations are naturally
as promiscuous as those of their husbands. The circumstance that they
control them better argues, they assert, more sense; it does not imply
a difference in nature.
Remarks of this kind are often made by women who, nevertheless,
live exemplary lives and would scorn to revenge themselves upon an
unfaithful husband by imitating his conduct. Nevertheless there is no
reason to suppose that they deliberately misrepresent their feelings,
and we can only conclude that, as usually happens, a new tendency is
manifesting itself in feeling some time before it is translated into
action.
For these reasons I do not think that any convincing arguments as to
the future can be based on the alleged monogamousness of women in the
present. Nor, so soon as the force of the monogamous habit wanes, do I
think that women will consent to put up with the manifest disadvantages
of a system which is based upon the assumption that it is as strong
as it ever was. It is certain that they will not be deterred by the
protests of outraged males. Conventional morality, as I have already
pointed out, like many of our other institutions such as matinées,
concerts and God, is kept going by women, and directly women withdraw
their support, not all the opposition of men will avail to save it.
What then is likely to happen?
Certainly not a relapse into complete promiscuity. The belief that
people are fundamentally licentious, and that a partial removal of
the barriers with which society has hedged about the business of
reproduction will precipitate the population into a welter of unbridled
license, pleasantly shocking though it is to the minds of respectable
people, has absolutely no foundation in fact.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account