Thrasymachus : $b or, The future of moralsJoad, C. E. M. (Cyril Edwin Mitchinson)
Philosophy
Thrasymachus : $b or, The future of morals
Joad, C. E. M. (Cyril Edwin Mitchinson)
Ethics
[2] _The Town Labourer_, by J. L. and Barbara Hammond.
To its superior utility in this respect we must in part attribute the
success of Christianity. Of all religions known to man it lays the
greatest stress upon those virtues whose practice is advantageous to
the stronger. It glorifies weakness and sentimentalizes over failure;
its heaven is for the submissive and the inefficient; its hell for
the dominant and the proud. Just as the charitable worker takes the
revolutionary edge off poverty by distributing coal and blankets to
the victims of acute industrial distress, so the priest promotes
submissiveness by inculcating the duties of sobriety, meekness,
unselfishness, honesty, and contentment. These virtues make good
workmen and prosperous employers, and, if they are only developed
to a sufficient degree, will enable their fortunate possessors
cheerfully to put up with bad wages, long hours, wretched houses, and
social servitude. The contrary virtues of manliness, self-reliance
and independence springing from a spirit passionately resentful of
injustice, quick to resist an injury and idealistically determined to
make a better place of this world instead of waiting passively for the
next one, are discouraged as savouring of pride and self-sufficiency,
and as showing a reprehensible tendency to look for help to oneself
instead of to God, our helper in time of trouble. The rich, to be sure,
possess these virtues; but then the message of religion is _from_, not
_to_, the rich.
But Thrasymachus has yet one more observation to make to us before
we leave him to turn to the future. The penalty of law breaking on a
small scale is prison, and of trivial wickedness, social ostracism.
But what of law-breaking on a large scale, and a wickedness powerful
enough to flout the public opinion to which others succumb? These are
the qualities of the stronger and they reap the stronger’s reward. The
rebel is the patriot who fails, the patriot is the rebel who prevails.
This is the lesson of the past, and those who read it may learn that
if only they are strong enough to succeed, they need not trouble
themselves about the respectability of their credentials. Nor has the
position altered to-day. The man who steals a leg of mutton goes to
prison for a month; the captain of industry grown rich on the profits
stolen from his workmen gets a knighthood. The man who has murdered
the wife who has annoyed him gets hanged for his pains; the man who
kills his fellow men for nourishment is denounced as a cannibal; but
the great general who plans the death of vast multitudes of his fellows
whom he has never seen, with whom he has never exchanged a cross word
and whom he does not require for purposes of sustenance, is hailed as
the saviour of his country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account