Three Days in the Village, and Other Sketches.: Written from September 1909 to July 1910. — John Shaqi
Three Days in the Village, and Other Sketches.: Written from September 1909 to July 1910.Tolstoy, Leo, graf
General
Three Days in the Village, and Other Sketches.: Written from September 1909 to July 1910.
Tolstoy, Leo, graf
Russian fiction -- Translations into English; Short stories, Russian -- Translations into English
This dream set me again thinking about the land question: a
question of which those who live constantly in the country, among a
poverty-stricken agricultural peasant population, cannot help thinking.
I know I have often written about it; but under the influence of that
dream, even at the risk of repeating myself, I once more felt the need
to express myself. _Carthago delenda est._ As long as people's attitude
towards private property in land remains unchanged, the cruelty,
madness and evil of this form of the enslavement of some men by others,
cannot be pointed out too frequently.
People say that land is property, and they say this because the
Government recognises private property in land. But fifty years ago the
Government upheld private property in human beings; yet a time came
when it was admitted that human beings cannot be private property,
and the Government ceased to hold them to be property. So it will be
with property in land. The Government now upholds that property, and
protects it by its power; but a day will come when the Government will
cease to acknowledge this kind of property, and will abolish it. The
Government will have to abolish it, because private property in land
is just such an injustice as property in men--serfdom--used to be. The
difference lies only in the fact that serfdom was a direct, definite
slavery, while land-slavery is indirect and indefinite. Then Peter was
John's slave, whereas now Peter is the slave of some person unknown,
but certainly of him who owns the land Peter requires in order to
feed himself and his family. And not only is land-slavery as unjust
and cruel a slavery as serfdom used to be, it is even harder on the
slaves, and more criminal on the part of the slave-holders. For under
serfdom--if not from sympathy, then at least from self-interest--the
owner was obliged to see to it that his serf did not wither away and
die of want, but to the best of his ability and understanding he looked
after his slaves' morality. Now the landowner cares nothing if his
landless slave withers away or becomes demoralised; for he knows that
however many men die or become depraved at his work, he will always be
able to find workmen.
The injustice and cruelty of the new, present-day
slavery--land-slavery--is so evident, and the condition of the slaves
is everywhere so hard, that one would have expected this new slavery
to have been recognised by this time as out of date, just as serfdom
was admittedly out of date half a century ago; and it should, one would
have thought, have been abolished, as serfdom was abolished.
"But," it is said, "property in land cannot be abolished, for it
would be impossible to divide equally among all the labourers and
non-labourers the advantages given by land of different qualities."
But that is not true. To abolish property in land, no distribution of
land is necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account