Three French Moralists and The Gallantry of France — John Shaqi
Three French Moralists and The Gallantry of FranceGosse, Edmund
Philosophy
Three French Moralists and The Gallantry of France
Gosse, Edmund
La Bruyère, Jean de, 1645-1696; La Rochefoucauld, François, duc de, 1613-1680; Vauvenargues, 1715-1747; World War, 1914-1918 -- France
But after two centuries of canonization of the Condes, it has now
become the fashion to denigrate them to an equal excess. The
traditional figure of the Grand Conde, Olympian and sublime, has been
exposed by pitiless documentary evidence. La Bruyere's latest and most
learned editor, M. Emile Magne, gives a terrible picture of the
Prince's meanness and dirtiness; Harpagon in an ostler's jacket, he
calls him, _en souquenille_. But to dwell on all this is to forget
that the great Conde, even in his ugly old age, was haloed by the
glory of having been the first soldier of the world. It was a
privilege, even at the end, to be admitted to his intimacy, and I
believe that we pity La Bruyere more than he pitied himself. It
scandalizes the biographers that the Prince, on one occasion, made La
Bruyere dance a _pas seul_ before him, twanging a tune on the guitar.
I suppose De Quincey would have been complaisant if the Duke of
Wellington had asked him to whistle "Home, Sweet Home" to him. There
is a limit, after all, to the modern theory of the Dignity of Letters.
Valincourt says that "All the time La Bruyere lived in the House of
Conde, everybody was always making fun of him." Possibly the fear of
appearing pedantic among all these people of fashion and these
tinselled flunkeys made him lend himself to ridicule. They all teased
and mocked him, I suppose, but not, I think, so as seriously to hurt
him, and now, with his book in our hands, the laugh is on his side.
For when we examine carefully we see that his position in the House of
Conde improved as time went on. He got rid of his rivals, the other
tutors; when the Grand Conde died, La Bruyere got rid of his dreadful
pupil as well. We find him no longer "precepteur," but "gentilhomme de
M. le Duc,"--no longer, that is, a mere scholastic drudge, but a sort
of lord-in-waiting. He had probably a large increase of salary, since
in 1687 he seems to have resigned his "charge" at Caen. Instead of
being pinned to the dark apartment in the recesses of the Cite, he now
revolved in ceaseless movement between Chantilly and Fontainebleau,
Paris and Versailles. He became a sort of confidential reader to the
Duke and Duchess, an essential part of the suite. After the first
years, he had a great deal of leisure. He could retire to the security
of a handsomely furnished apartment--upholstered in green--on the
second floor of the Hotel de Conde, opposite the Luxembourg, and he
had another set of rooms at Versailles. The bondage became, I expect,
no real bondage at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account