So much for Mr. Shakespeare. I differ from him (as you were about
to say) in that I prefer to see my plays printed, and he obviously
preferred to see his acted. People sometimes say to me: “How
beautifully Mary Brown played that part, and wasn’t John Smith’s
creation wonderful, and how tremendously grateful you must be.” She
did; it was; I am. The more I see of actors and actresses at
rehearsals (and it is only at rehearsals of your own plays that you
can see them at all, or learn anything of their art), by so much the
more do I admire, am I amazed by, their skill. There are heights and
depths and breadths and subtleties in acting, still more in producing,
of which the casual playgoer, even the regular playgoer if he only
sees the stage from the front, knows nothing. But the fact remains
that, to the author, the part must always seem better than the player.
That great actor John Smith may “create” the part of Yorick, but the
author created it first, and created it, to his own vision, every bit
as much in flesh and blood as did, later, the actor. You may read the
plays here, and say that this or the other character does not “live,”
meaning by this that you are unable to visualise him, unable to
imagine for yourself, granted the circumstance, a person so acting, so
reacting. Well—“If it be so, so it is, you know”; it is very easy not
to be a great artist; I have failed. But do not believe that, because
a character does not live for you, therefore it does not live for the
author. While we are writing, how can we help seeing the fellow? We
shut our eyes, and he is there; we open them, and he is there; we dip
our pen into the ink-pot, and he is waiting on the edge for us. We
shake him out on to the paper.... Ah, but now he is dead, you say.
Well, well, he lived a moment before.
So when John Smith “creates” the character of Yorick, he creates him
in his own image—John Smith-Yorick; a great character, it may be, to
those who see him thus for the first time, but lacking something to us
who have lived with the other for months. For the other was plain
Yorick—and only himself could play him. Alas, poor Yorick, I knew him
well, a fellow of most excellent fancy. Would that you could know him
too! Well, you may find him in the printed page ... or you may not ...
but here only, if anywhere, is he to be found.
A. A. M.
THE GREAT BROXOPP
FOUR CHAPTERS IN HIS LIFE
CHARACTERS
Broxopp.
Nancy (_his wife_).
Jack (_his son_).
Sir Roger Tenterden.
Iris Tenterden.
Honoria Johns.
Ronald Derwent.
Norah Field.
Benham.
Mary.
Alice.
* * * * *
_The Scene is laid in the Broxopp home of the period._
_Twenty-four years pass between Act I. and Act II., eighteen months
between Act II. and Act III., and a year between Act III. and Act IV._
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account