Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
Thus down to nearly the middle of the twelfth century, Bosnia continued
to own allegiance to her Serbian suzerains, and the claims of the
Croats to Bosnia continued to be little more than nominal till their
own country fell into hands more capable of enforcing them. But at the
beginning of the twelfth century the Magyars overthrew the kingdom of
the Croats, and in 1141 Geiza II. of Hungary completed the conquest of
Bosnia, or, as it is generally known in the Hungarian annals, of Rama,
from the little river of that name, flowing into the Narenta.[9] Still,
the Hungarian dominion does not seem as yet to have been much more than
a vague suzerainty. Bosnia, indeed, throughout the whole of this period,
seems to have stood aloof from all its neighbours. It might own a nominal
allegiance, now to Serbia, now to Croatia, now to Hungary, but it enjoyed
a practical independence. Its general isolation from the main current of
Serbian history may be gathered from the chronicler of Dioclea; and when
Manuel Comnenus reduced Hungary to a temporary subjection, his historian
Cinnamus was struck with the same phenomenon. ‘The Drina,’ says he,
‘divides Bosthna from the rest of Serbia. For Bosthna is not subject
to the Grand-Župan of Serbia, but the people were at that time under
their own magistrates, and used their own customs.’ The recent Russian
historian of the Serbs and Bulgarians[10] traces many of the later
misfortunes of Bosnia to this fatal estrangement from the other Sclavonic
lands.
The Hungarian alliance now makes this alienation irrevocable. Cinnamus
shows the close relations existing between Bosnia and Hungary at the
date of Manuel’s invasion when he goes on to say that ‘Boritzes,[11]
Exarch of Bosthna,’ aided the King of Hungary against the Greeks; and,
indeed, we know from other sources that the Bosnian Ban was himself an
illegitimate son of the Magyar king, Coloman. Manuel reduced Bosnia, with
Croatia and other parts of Hungary, for a while; but the Ban was not long
in recovering the province. The Hungarian connection was only cemented
the more firmly, and on Borić’s death, in 1168, his son, the new Ban
Culin, accepted his investiture from Bela III., and subscribed himself
henceforth _Fiduciarius Regni Hungariæ_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account