Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
The monks were unfeignedly astonished at our appearance, and would
hardly believe that we had arrived on foot and without escort. They said
that to travel in Bosnia at present without Turkish guards was sheer
madness; that the state of the country was becoming more critical every
moment; and that the insurrection in the Herzegovina had roused Mahometan
fanaticism to such a pitch that all the Christians of the neighbourhood
were seriously dreading a massacre. The monks themselves certainly
seemed to share in the prevailing panic; for the day before, when the
Latins of the district were assembled at the monastery to celebrate the
feast of the Assumption, the brothers had sent off to the Mutasarìf, the
Turkish governor of Travnik, for protection. The Mutasarìf, recognising,
apparently, the legitimacy of their fears, had sent them a guard of
soldiers, and the Christian congregation had performed their devotions
under the tutelage of Turkish bayonets.
It may at first sight seem strange that people in fear of Turkish
violence should have had recourse to Turkish protection, and perhaps
stranger still that such protection should have been accorded them.
The explanation, in fact, lies at the root of much that is least
intelligible to the outsider in the present state of Bosnia.
It has been the policy of the Mahometan conqueror to favour the Roman
Church in the province, as a ready counterpoise to the orthodox
Serbians, who in numbers far outweigh the Mussulmans,[196] and who, in
contradistinction to the Latins, are imbued with national aspirations. On
the other hand, the Roman ecclesiastics as a rule entertain a far more
wholesome abhorrence of their fellow-Christians than of the infidel,
and so the alliance is compacted by mutual benefits. The Turks, from
the year 1463, when Sultan Mahomet granted the Franciscan monks their
great Charter of Liberties, the ‘Atname,’[197] have been politicly
liberal to them, exempting their monasteries and lands from taxation,
and freeing the brothers from the capitation tax which weighs on the
rayah. In return, the monks have exerted their influence in rendering
the Latins submissive to their rulers, and have backed up the Mahometans
in their oppression of the Serbs, as the members of the Greek Church
are significantly called. When the Latins have been ill used, it has
been principally owing to the weakness of the Osmanlì element and the
bigotry of the Sclavonic renegades of Bosnia, of whose almost independent
rule mention has already been made. When, in 1850, Omer Pashà dealt the
death-blow to Mahometan feudalism here, and practically recovered Bosnia
for the Sultan, he received support from many of the Latins. At the
present moment the danger which the monks were in such dread of, was not
from the Turkish authorities, but from the Sclavonic Mussulmans, the
representatives of the old provincial Janissarism, the descendants of
the Capetans and Begs, who eye the myrmidons of the Stamboul Government
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account