Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
It was during the reign of Culin that this great Puritan movement
attained its widest dimensions, and it is from a contemporary of his,
the Italian Reniero Sacconi, who from a heretic became an inquisitor,
that we obtain the most satisfactory evidence as to the organization of
this early Protestant Church, and the solidarity of its various members,
Sclavonic, Greek, Romance, and Teutonic. The Church of the Cathari, as
he calls them, numbered then as many as thirteen bishoprics, amongst
which that of Bosnia or ‘Slavonia’ was not the least important. By
Culin’s time, the Bogomilian missionaries had succeeded in disseminating
their Armenian doctrines from Philippopolis to Bordeaux, and had formed,
if we may so term it, a middle kingdom of their own—a Lotharingia
of heterodoxy, extending in an unbroken zone through the centre of
orthodox Europe, from the Black Sea to the Atlantic. Nay, the ark of
the faithful, borne northwards and westwards on the free bosom of the
Rhine, had crossed the Channel, and penetrated, as it were by our
great English river, to the seat of English learning; and at the very
time when Protestant Christendom looked to the Ban of Bosnia as its
chief protector, his Angevin contemporary, our Henry II., was branding
Paulicians at Oxford.[50]
Rapid and astonishing as was the spread of these Oriental doctrines
through Latin Christendom, there seems no difficulty in accounting for
it when we remember the missionary zeal which the Sclavonic Bogomiles
had inherited from their Armenian teachers, and which led them, as
we have seen, to set apart funds for the support of Gospellers among
unbelievers. The same impulses which planted an Armenian faith among
the Sclaves are sufficient to account for the success with which the
new converts acclimatized what was now a Sclavonic faith amongst Greeks
and Latins. It is certain that the Bulgarian propaganda made use of
existing trade-routes by land and sea. This indeed is not the place to
enquire what part Bulgaria and what part Bosnia, what part the Save, the
Danube and the Rhine, the Po or the Adige, the commercial currents of the
Adriatic and the Mediterranean—what part Durazzo and the Egnatian Way,
what part Byzantium and Byzantine Lower Italy, may have severally and
collectively played in conveying the Bogomilian heresy to Toulouse,[51]
Milan and Cologne. On the whole the Bosnian influence may be regarded as
later and secondary. It is probable that the first wave of propagandism
was almost entirely Bulgarian, and followed in the wake of Greek
merchantmen. The great part played by Bosnia was rather that of asylum
for the persecuted, and promoter of the faith, in days when heresy had
been stamped out elsewhere with fire and sword. We have, however, precise
data as to the Bogomilian religion having been communicated to Dalmatia
through commercial relations with the interior of Bosnia,[52] and
doubtless, just as the Bulgarians, the South-Easternmost of the Sclavonic
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account