Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875Evans, Arthur, Sir
History
Through Bosnia and the Herzegóvina on foot during the insurrection, August and September 1875
Evans, Arthur, Sir
Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Description and travel; Bosnia and Herzegovina -- History -- Rebellion of 1875
That the change was much regretted even by the Catholic population of
the country may be doubted. The history of the Hungarian Banat of Jaycze
is indeed less stained with religious persecutions than that of the
earlier kingdom, but much of that feudal tyranny which had contributed
in no unimportant manner to the conquest of Mahomet was still at work to
alienate the wretched Bosnian peasants. We have the convincing testimony
of an eyewitness, and a Doctor of the Roman Catholic University of
Bologna, that the rule of the Moslem was at this time looked upon as
less oppressive than that of the petty Christian Bans and Barons. ‘The
Bosniacs,’ says Montalbano, ‘are not so badly treated by the Turks, but
that those subject to Christian rule are not worse oppressed by their
own lords. And I myself have often seen no small multitude of country
people, having burnt their own houses in their despair, flee with their
wives and children and cattle and all that they possessed, to the country
under Turkish rule, for as much as the Turk extorteth little, save the
tithe. And therefore has it happened oftentimes that our armies in the
last Hungarian wars, when they have crossed the Ottoman border, find not
the Christian countrymen who, as they supposed, would be their friends
and helpers; or if so be they found them, they were hid in nooks, or
intent upon their flight; for no sufficient prohibition against outrages
and robberies is possible with the army. They think themselves well
off if haply their property and the honour of their women be left them
uninjured; whereas with the Turks, by reason of their great obedience,
these securities can be readily obtained.’[133]
Several desultory attempts have since been made on the part of the
Hapsburgs to recover it: by the Markgrave Ludwig of Baden, in 1688; by
Prince Eugene, in 1697, who pushed on as far as Bosna Serai itself, but
gained nothing by his hasty dash; and again in 1736 by the imperial
troops under the Prince of Saxe-Hildburghausen, which ended in the utter
rout of the Austrian army, amounting, it is said, to 80,000 men, and such
complete discomfiture, that Ali Pashà could boast that ‘not a hoof of
them was left behind.’[134] In 1790 Marshal Laudon took a few places in
Bosnia, but the French Revolution put a stop to these operations, and all
the towns captured in Bosnia were restored by the peace of Sistov.[135]
These later efforts may show that though the Emperor-King had resigned
his claim over Bosnia by the peace of Passarovitz in 1718, Austria, in
the last century at all events, had not resigned all hopes of recovering
the old fief of the Hungarian Crown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account