The forms which religious sentiment had assumed in the Middle Ages had
become unintelligible; the most highly endowed minds were dead to the
sublimity of Gothic architecture, and saw nothing but grotesque folly
in Dante's poetry. They seriously believed that religious doctrines and
ecclesiastical government were originally elaborate systems of fraud,
devised by sagacious and crafty tyrants for the sole purpose of
enslaving the multitude of mankind. No discrimination was shown. They
were as ready to throw away belief in God as in the miracles of St.
Columba, and to scout at the notion of a future life in the same terms
as those in which they denounced the forged donation of Constantine. The
flippant ease with which they disposed of the greatest questions, in
crass ignorance of the very nature of the problem to be solved, was well
illustrated in the remark of the astronomer Lalande, that he had swept
the entire heavens with his telescope and found no God there. A similar
instance of missing the point was furnished about fifty years ago by the
eminent physiologist Moleschott, when he exclaimed, "No thought without
phosphorus," and congratulated himself that he had forever disposed of
the human soul. I am inclined to think that those are the two remarks
most colossal in their silliness that ever appeared in print.
Very different in spirit was the acute reply of Laplace when reminded by
Napoleon that his great treatise on the dynamics of the solar system
contained no allusion to God. "Sire," said Laplace, "I had no need of
that hypothesis." This remark was profound in its truth, for it meant
that in order to give a specific explanation of any single group of
phenomena, it will not do to appeal to divine action, which is equally
the source of all phenomena. Science can deal only with secondary
causes. In the eighteenth century men of science were learning that such
is the case; men like Diderot and D'Alembert had come to realize it, and
they believed that the logical result was atheism. This was because the
only idea of God which they had ever been taught to entertain was the
Latin idea of a God remote from the world and manifested only through
occasional interferences with the order of nature. When they dismissed
this idea they declared themselves atheists. If they had been familiar
with the Greek idea of God as immanent in the world and manifested at
every moment through the orderly sequence of its phenomena, their
conclusions would doubtless have been very different.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account