Were this all that can be said about Saturn, the planet would scarcely
be more than a reduced and somewhat less interesting edition of
Jupiter. As it is, he possesses characteristics which make him
Jupiter's rival in point of interest, and, as a mere telescopic
picture, perhaps even his superior. When Galileo turned his telescope
upon Saturn, he was presented with what seemed an insoluble enigma.
It appeared to him that, instead of being a single globe, the planet
consisted of three globes in contact with one another; and this
supposed fact he intimated to Kepler in an anagram, which, when
rearranged, read: 'Altissimum planetam tergeminum observavi'--'I
have observed the most distant planet to be threefold.' Under better
conditions of observation, he remarked subsequently, the planet
appeared like an olive, as it still does with low powers. This was
sufficiently puzzling, but worse was to follow. After an interval,
on observing Saturn again, he found that the appearances which had so
perplexed him had altogether disappeared; the globe was single, like
those of the other planets. In his letter to Welser, dated December
4, 1612, the great astronomer describes his bewilderment, and his
fear lest, after all, it should turn out that his adversaries had been
right, and that his discoveries had been mere illusions.
Then followed a period when observers could only command optical power
sufficient to show the puzzling nature of the planet's appendages,
without revealing their true form. It appeared that Saturn had 'ansæ,'
or handles, on either side of him, between which and his body the
sky could be seen; and many uncouth figures are still preserved which
eloquently testify to the bewilderment of those who drew them, though
some of them are wonderfully accurate representations of the planet's
appearance when seen with insufficient means. The bewilderment was
sometimes veiled, in amusing cuttle-fish fashion, under an inky cloud
of sesquipedalian words. Thus Hevelius describes the aspects of Saturn
in the following blasting flight of projectiles: 'The mono-spherical,
the tri-spherical, the spherico-ansated, the elliptico-ansated,
and the spherico-cuspidated,' which is very beautiful no doubt, but
scarcely so simple as one could wish a popular explanation to be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account