The four outstanding meteor radiants are those named, but there are
very many others. Mr. Denning, to whom this branch of science owes so
much, estimates the number of distinct radiants known at about 4,400;
and it seems likely that every one of these showers, some of them, of
course very feeble, represents some comet deceased. The history of a
meteor shower would appear to be something like this: When the comet,
whose executor it is, has but recently deceased, it will appear as a
very brilliant periodic shower, occurring on only one or two nights
exactly at the point where the comet in its journeying would have
crossed the earth's track, and appearing only at the time when the
comet itself would have been there. Gradually the meteors get more and
more tailed out along the orbit, as runners of unequal staying powers
get strung out over a track in a long race, until the displays may
be repeated, with somewhat diminished splendour, year after year for
several years before and after the time when the parent comet is
due. At last they get thinly spread out over the whole orbit, and
the shower becomes an annual one, happening each year when the earth
crosses the orbit of the comet. This has already happened to the
Perseid shower; at least 500,000,000 miles of the orbit of Biela's
comet are studded with representatives of the Andromedes; and the
Leonid shower had already begun to show symptoms of the same process
at its appearance in 1866. Readers will remember the disappointment
caused by the failure of the Leonid shower to come up to time in 1899,
and it seems probable that the action of some perturbing cause has so
altered the orbit of this shower that it now passes almost clear
of the earth's path, so that we shall not have the opportunity of
witnessing another great display of the Leonid meteors.
So far as is known, no member of one of these great showers has
ever fallen to the earth. There are two possible exceptions to this
statement, as in 1095 a meteor fell to the ground during the progress
of a shower of Lyrids, and in 1885 another fell during a display of
the Andromedes. In neither case, however, was the radiant point noted,
and unless it was the same as that of the shower the fall of the
meteor was a mere coincidence. It seems probable that this is the
case, and the absence of any evidence that a specimen from a cometary
shower has reached the earth points to the extreme smallness of the
various members of the shower and also to the fine division of the
matter of the original comet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account