In contradistinction to a pure reflex, a tic is a complex or
associated act. There is, however, more than one centre for the
elaboration of these complex or associated acts, notably the
bulbo-medullary axis, and the cerebral polygon, as we call it. The
former serves as centre not merely for simple reflexes, but for
true associated acts also, such as conjugate deviation of the head
and eyes, walking movements in the decerebrate animal, etc.
We can conceive, then, a first group of non-mental tics
corresponding to and reproducing these movements of bulbo-medullary
origin.[17]
Let us turn now to our polygon formed by the various centres of
psychic automatism. Polygonal reactions, such as writing or
speaking, exceed both simple reflexes and bulbo-medullary
associated acts in complexity; they are to all appearance
spontaneous and in a certain measure intellectual, but they are
neither free nor conscious--attributes that distinguish the
functions of the centre O, the seat of the personal, conscious,
voluntary, responsible ego. The polygon consists of receptive
sensory centres for hearing, vision, and general sensibility, and
of transmitting motor centres for speaking, writing, and various
body movements. They all communicate with each other, with O, and
with the periphery, so rendering possible voluntary modification of
automatic action. In some cases, on the contrary, there may be a
sort of dissociation between O. and the polygon, when the activity
of the latter becomes supreme, as during sleep--we dream with our
polygon--or in distraction.
In states intermediate between the physiological and the
pathological, pure independent polygonal action may reveal itself
in the remarkable phenomena of nightmare, the divining rod, table
turning, automatic writing, etc., while certain aphasias and
agraphias, somnambulism, catalepsy, and various hysterical
conditions constitute the pathology of the polygon.
The fact that all mental attributes and functions are situate in O
definitely negatives, in my opinion, any classification in the
category of mental diseases of such conditions as hysteria, so many
of whose manifestations are polygonal alone.
Our second group of tics--polygonal tics, we may style them--are
correspondingly associated, co-ordinated, and psychical, but not
mental; they have nought to do with the superior psychism of O.
Finally, in direct and strict dependence on an actual idea is a
third group of tics, the psychical tics properly so called.
We have reproduced Grasset's theory in some detail since it is one of
the two most recent contributions to the study of the tic's
pathogenesis. The other is that of Brissaud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account