Time and Life: Mr. Darwin's "Origin of Species"Huxley, Thomas Henry
Science
Time and Life: Mr. Darwin's "Origin of Species"
Huxley, Thomas Henry
Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882. On the origin of species; Evolution (Biology)
And while the inquirer has thus learnt that existing forces—_give them
time_—are competent to produce all the physical phenomena we meet with
in the rocks, so, on the other side, the study of the marks left in the
ancient strata by past physical actions shows that these were similar
to those which now obtain. Ancient beaches are met with whose pebbles
are like those found on modern shores; the hardened sea-sands of the
oldest epochs show ripple-marks, such as may now be found on every
sandy coast; nay, more, the pits left by ancient rain-drops prove that
even in the very earliest ages, the “bow in the clouds” must have
adorned the palaeozoic firmament. So that if we could reverse the
legend of the Seven Sleepers,—if we could sleep back through the past,
and awake a million ages before our own epoch, in the midst of the
earliest geologic times,—there is no reason to believe that sea, or
sky, or the aspect of the land would warn us of the marvellous
retrospection.
Such are the beliefs which modern physical geologists hold, or, at any
rate, tend towards holding. But, in so doing, it is obvious that they
by no means prejudge the question, as to what the physical condition of
the globe may have been before our chapters of its history begin, in
what may be called (with that licence which is implied in the
often-used term “prehistoric epoch”) “pre-geologic time.” The views
indicated, in fact, are not only quite consistent with the hypothesis,
that, in the still earlier period referred to, the condition of our
world was very different; but they may be held by some to necessitate
that hypothesis. The physical philosopher who is accurately acquainted
with the velocity of a cannon-ball, and the precise character of the
line which it traverses for a yard of its course, is necessitated by
what he knows of the laws of nature to conclude that it came from a
certain spot, whence it was impelled by a certain force, and that it
has followed a certain trajectory. In like manner, the student of
physical geology, who fully believes in the uniformity of the general
condition of the earth through geologic time, may feel compelled by
what he knows of causation, and by the general analogy of nature, to
suppose that our solar system was once a nebulous mass; that it
gradually condensed, that it broke up into that wonderful group of
harmoniously rolling balls we call planets and satellites, and that
then each of these underwent its appointed metamorphosis, until at last
our own share of the cosmic vapour passed into that condition in which
we first meet with definite records of its state, and in which it has
since, with comparatively little change, remained.
The doctrine of uniformity and the doctrine of progression are,
therefore, perfectly consistent; perhaps, indeed, they might be shown
to be necessarily connected with one another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account