Timotheus : $b or, The future of the theatreDobrée, Bonamy
Science
Timotheus : $b or, The future of the theatre
Dobrée, Bonamy
Theater -- Miscellanea
These plays were always made entirely by one man――for this fairfusser
actually had one or two disciples――who directed each movement, whether
of single persons or crowds, either tumultuous, or in the dances,
which met with much applause, though they seemed to me even less
comprehensible than some of the later Russian ballets which were lately
in vogue for a short time. I was told he was always very careful about
the ‘rhythmic order’ of the piece, whatever that may mean, and its
groupings. All was done first on a little model, which in the end
became a record repeated on the larger scale. For the voices he took
human beings, going over and over each phrase until he got exactly
the tone he wanted, and these he recorded, timing them afterwards with
the movements, so that the whole play went, as it were, by clockwork.
Thus there was nothing spontaneous about it, and this is a fault, since
art, according to many serious philosophers, is a kind of game, and
thus, surely, if any notion of being drilled creeps in, the pleasure
evaporates.
The same man also, as a rule, wrote the words, which did not remain in
my memory because I understood them so little, seeing that they dealt
with thoughts and feelings which in our day we take small notice of.
That this must be so is easy to see; for every age concerns itself
with a different relation of man to what is outside him. We are now,
to be sure, beginning to do what they were doing,[10] in dealing with
man’s relation to man’s idea of what he is; that is, so to say in the
plain words of Albertus Magnus, seeking “the causation of causes in
the causes of things.” But these plays bewildered me, as I own without
shame, for would not Dr. Johnson himself have been adrift at a play by
Signor Pirandello? And since there was so much I could not fathom, I
should only impart a false twist to the meaning however much I tried to
give a true account.
[10] In 2,100 O. S.
But I fear these plays disordered me, for the unnatural is a sort of
poison, and I have never since been able to feel real pleasure at any
drama of to-day even in the best theatres in Paris, New York, or
London. Indeed I have almost conceived an aversion from our stage; and
it is only the importunities of my friends that make me go to a play
once or twice in a year, so as not to seem unsociable. If the choice is
left to me, we go to the English version of a French farce, for these
are usually free from any meaning at all: and if one expects nothing,
one cannot be disappointed.
* * * * *
Transcriber’s Notes:
――Text in italics is enclosed by underscores (_italics_).
――Punctuation and spelling inaccuracies were silently corrected.
――Archaic and variable spelling has been preserved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account