To Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in disguise : $b with historical notices of the Kurdish tribes and the Chaldeans of KurdistanSoane, Ely Banister
History
To Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in disguise : $b with historical notices of the Kurdish tribes and the Chaldeans of Kurdistan
Soane, Ely Banister
Iraq -- Description and travel; Kurdistan -- Description and travel; Tigris River Valley -- Description and travel
The town is not a large one, but its bazaar is very busy, and its
Government House always thronged with people. There is a square with a
few trees, and the place is sprinkled with bits of old buildings, some
adapted to modern use, and others built into new walls. Under the hills
one is shown the Pool of Abraham, who is supposed to have performed
various feats here. The water-supply is plentiful, the scenery around
beautiful in its ruggedness and the fantastic nature of its hills,
and I was told that there are very pretty gardens in the immediate
vicinity. It is one of those places one sees so often in Asiatic
Turkey, where life could be peaceful among beautiful surroundings and
prosperity assured, were it not for the Turks and their misrule.
Urfa, or Edessa as the Romans called it, stood in Assyrian times upon
the borders of Greater Assyria, and “the lands of Nairi,” the highlands
immediately to the north, which are now known as the western end of
Kurdistan, and its name does not appear as a city till the time of the
Roman invasion, when we hear of it as the capital of the country of
Osrhœne, whose kings were always called Abgarus, according to the Roman
mutilation of the Semitic name. The people were Arabs; and Edessa,
while capital, marked the most northerly point of the kingdom.
At the same time the kingdom was on the northern marches of
Mesopotamia, and always being in a position of a frontier state between
Roman and Parthian, Arab and mountaineer--either Armenian or Kurd,
though it is not known if the Kurds had spread so far west--was
subjected to the fury of all its neighbours in wars, and played traitor
to each on many occasions.
After the break-up of the Empire of Alexander, about the third century
B.C., Mesopotamia fell into the hands of the Seleucid princes, and as
they weakened, the northern portion of their kingdom fell before the
advancing Romans. It was with Pompey (65 B.C.) that the king of Edessa,
Abgarus, king of the people of Osrhœne, made a treaty, and accepted
actual if not formal vassalage.
Ten years later, Crassus, as already mentioned, made his expedition
against the rising power of Parthia, and was deceived and deserted by
Abgarus after being lured into a position of danger. Thereupon Edessa
became allied to Parthia, and incidentally saved itself from the
destruction consequent upon conquest.
A century later, and we see the Parthian Empire torn over a question
of succession: Meherdates, a Parthian prince, at the suggestion of
Rome, proceeds to win his kingdom by the sword from Godarz. _En route_
he passes by Edessa, and now the Abgarus, with a ready facility for
duplicity, after feasting him, sets him upon a road he knows will
end in disaster. His theory was fully borne out by the defeat of the
pretender at Erbil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account