To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novelMcKenna, Stephen
History
To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novel
McKenna, Stephen
Great Britain -- History -- George V, 1910-1936 -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Spouses -- Fiction
“And how will you set your solemn league and covenant to work?,”
Hornbeck enquired sceptically.
I could make no reply until I had found more time to think; time, too,
perhaps, to talk with my uncle Bertrand of the old Disarmament League
and of the propaganda that issued from _Peace_ office before the war.
When I told Barbara that, so far as I could see, my work was only
beginning, I felt that in all likelihood the task before our generation
would be to create a ‘will to peace’ out of the present disgust with
war. If history was human nature repeating itself, there had been the
same disgust at the end of every great war; but the memory of that
disgust faded quickly. It was no match for the urgent plea that honour
or security was at stake; no match for the cynical resignation of those
who said that there always had been wars and always would be.
“Of course you’re right to try,” was the utmost encouragement that I
could win even from Violet, “but these Hague Conventions and things
haven’t done much good, have they?”
“No one has yet appealed to the rank-and-file,” I answered. “No one has
appealed while the full horror of war was vividly remembered. No one has
shewn the dumb millions of the world how much alike they all are, how
they swim together and sink together. In all I’ve been reading these
last few weeks I’ve been amazed by the sameness of conditions in all
countries. If we can work on that till the sameness becomes a oneness
. . .”
In aiming at perspective for my second panel, I tried to set my own
impressions and experiences of the war beside those of the cosmopolitan
population that floated through Cannes in these first weeks of the
armistice. When we had passed the stage of fancying that our individual
histories were unique, I was more struck by the similarities of what I
heard than by the differences. Necessarily, the islander and the
continental must always disagree on foreign politics; and in Cannes I
met for the first time the chronic terror that is begotten of land
frontiers. “It’s all very well for you,” I was told by Italians, Greeks,
Poles and Dutch: “You’re an island.” With allowance for this, I felt
that the war had left on every country an almost identical mark. The
Austrians and Germans whom I met in Monte Carlo, old journalistic
allies—for the most part—, were as bitterly convinced that the war had
been forced upon them as we in England were convinced that they had
forced it on us; but, when we had agreed to differ, their description of
the last four years in their own countries might have been applied,
almost without a word changed, to England. There were, I discovered,
idlers, _embusqués_ and adventurers of both sexes in all classes
everywhere; and it was amusing, for one who thought of a German
alternately as a sheep and a genius, to hear the tribute of Austria and
Germany to our more than Teutonic docility and enterprise. France had
her rapacious profiteers, Prussia her bloated munition-makers. The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account