Toadstools, mushrooms, fungi, edible and poisonous; one thousand American fungi: How to select and cook the edible; how to distinguish and avoid the poisonous, with full botanic descriptions. Toadstool poisons and their treatment, instructions to students, recipes for cooking, etc., etc.McIlvaine, Charles
Science
Toadstools, mushrooms, fungi, edible and poisonous; one thousand American fungi: How to select and cook the edible; how to distinguish and avoid the poisonous, with full botanic descriptions. Toadstool poisons and their treatment, instructions to students, recipes for cooking, etc., etc.
McIlvaine, Charles
Cooking (Mushrooms); Edible mushrooms -- North America; Fungi -- North America; Mushrooms; Mushrooms, Poisonous -- North America
Frequent in the West Virginia forests, 1881–1885. Chester county, Pa.,
1887–1890. In mixed woods. July to September. _McIlvaine._
It differs from R. vesca in its cap being minutely granulated instead of
streaked, and in becoming acrid with age.
The caps are of good quality, needing to be well cooked.
FRA´GILES.
* _Gills and spores white._
=R. eme´tica= Fr.—an emetic. (Plate XLIV, fig. 2, p. 184.) =Pileus= 3–4
in. broad, at first rosy then _blood-color_, tawny when old, sometimes
becoming yellow and at length (in moist places) white, at first
bell-shaped then flattened or depressed, polished, _margin_ at length
_furrowed and tubercular_. =Flesh= _white, reddish under the separable
pellicle_. =Stem= spongy-stuffed, stout, elastic when young, fragile
when older, even, white or reddish. =Gills= somewhat _free_, broad,
somewhat distant, shining white.
Handsome, regular, moderately firm, but fragile when full grown, _taste_
very _acrid_. _Fries._
=Spores= shining white, _Fries_; spheroid, echinulate, 8–10µ _K._; 7µ
_W.G.S._
Maryland, _Miss Banning_; New York, _Peck_, Rep. 22; Indiana, Illinois,
_H.I. Miller_.
Said to act as its name implies as an emetic. Certainly poisonous.
_Stevenson._
Krapp says he has himself experienced rare inconveniences from eating
it. Preferred to others in Indiana and Illinois. _H.I. Miller_, 1898.
The varying reports upon R. emetica are quoted above. In 1881, in the
West Virginia mountains, I began testing this Russula and soon found
that it was harmless. At least twenty persons ate it in quantity, during
its season, for four years. Yet, in my many published articles, I
continued, out of regard for the opinions of others and in excess of
caution, to warn against all bitter and peppery fungi. But from that
time until the present I have eaten it, and I have made special effort
to establish its innocence by getting numbers of my friendly helpers to
eat it.
It was suggested by one of its prosecutors that perhaps I was mistaking
another fungus for it. In October, 1898, I sent to Professor Peck a lot
of the Russula I was eating. He wrote: “It seems to be R. emetica as you
state. It certainly is hot enough for it.”
=R. pectina´ta= Fr.—_pecten_, a comb. =Pileus= 3 in. broad, at first
gluey, _toast-brown_, then dry, becoming pale, tan, with the _disk_
always _darker_, fleshy, _rigid_, convex then flattened and depressed or
concavo-infundibuliform (basin-shaped); margin thin, _pectinato-sulcate_
(deeply ribbed), here and there irregularly shaped. =Flesh= _white,
light yellowish under the pellicle_, which is not easily separable.
=Stem= curt, 3 in. long, ¾–1 in. thick, _rigid_, spongy-stuffed,
longitudinally _slightly striate, shining white_, often attenuated at
the base. =Gills= _attenuato-free_ behind, broader toward the margin,
somewhat crowded, _equal_, simple, white.
Odor weak, but nauseous, approaching that of R. f[oe]tens. _Fries._
=Spores= 8–9µ diameter _Massee_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account