Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905Various
History
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
Those orthodox partisan editors who sneered at my comment on W. R. Hearst
as a man who _did_ things while others were talk—talk—talking, will
please study the election returns from Chicago and hand me out revised
opinions.
That was a Hearst fight, and Hearst himself was personally in the thick
of it. He said little and accomplished much.
Would _still_ like to swap a score or two of mere talkers like—well, no
matter—for another such myth as Hearst.
* * * * *
A wise man—and his name is Dennis—has an article in the April number
of _Everybody’s_ to prove that free trade has created in England that
poverty-stricken mass of humanity which he includes under the general
name of “Hooligan.”
According to Mr. Robert Hunter, the Hooligans of the United States
aggregate 10,000,000—and we haven’t had any free trade, either.
Evidently the wise Mr. Dennis has not located the true cause of poverty
in England.
It was famine, and the high price of bread, which forced Sir Robert Peel
to abandon protection and to carry free trade into effect.
Bread was cheapened and the cost of living reduced.
Did _that_ inflict such great misery upon the poor?
If the wise Mr. Dennis will study the subject more thoroughly he will
probably reach the conclusion that poverty in England is the product
of land monopoly, a vicious financial system and a governmental
establishment in which a lot of hereditary bloodsuckers prey upon the
body politic.
Free trade is the law of nature; it never did, and never can produce
national misery, poverty or decadence.
* * * * *
If the wise Mr. Dennis will study the subject thoroughly he will discover
that the Corn Laws of 1815 were passed for the purpose of giving special
benefits to the landlords of Great Britain. By the poor the act was
regarded as such a direct attack upon themselves—such a barefaced
design to make them pay higher prices for the necessaries of life—that
resistance to the law grew riotous and had to be put down by force.
Says Justin McCarthy, the historian:
“The poor everywhere saw the bread of their family threatened, saw the
food of their children almost taken out of their mouths, and they broke
into wild extremes of anger.”
But the soldiers were called out, the riots put down, and a sufficient
number of the poor hanged to quell the remainder.
_Thus_ the land monopolists of Great Britain—many of whose titles to
their enormous holdings are tainted with all manner of fraud and wrong
enforced and odious law which robbed the poor to benefit the rich.
In 1817 the troops were used again to crush the laborers who were crying
out against oppression.
In 1819 soldiers were used once more.
Then the submission of despair brought quiet times until 1830, when
the people again attempted to throw off the hateful yoke of barbarous
laws. In the House of Commons Sir Francis Burdett denounced the Duke of
Wellington as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account