Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905 — John Shaqi
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905Various
General
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
Some 30,000,000 Frenchmen did not enter into this world of privilege.
The merchant, the lawyer, the doctor, the manufacturer, the farmer, the
laborer—all these stood outside the pearly gates, catching only a glimpse
of the radiance within, hearing only, as from a distance, the music of
this Eden, created by class legislation.
The peasant neither owned his land absolutely nor _himself_ absolutely.
Over him and his was suspended the heavy sword of class privilege.
The noble hunter of game, who enjoyed the exclusive privilege of killing
game, might trample down his grain with the utmost unconcern, at whatever
time the pleasure of the noble huntsman dictated. Mr. Peasant was not
allowed to protect his fields and crops by putting up any kind of
inclosure.
Mr. Peasant must not kill the wild boar or the antlered stag, even though
those noble beasts, reserved for noble huntsmen, were destroying the crop
upon which he and his family were dependent for a living.
He could not, under any conditions whatsoever, destroy the pigeons which
came sweeping down upon his grain, nor must he, during certain seasons,
manure his crop or hoe out the grass, lest he injure the flavor of the
young partridges, and deprive them of the shelter necessary for their
comfort and growth.
He could not press his grapes save at the nobleman’s wine-press, nor
grind his wheat save at the nobleman’s mill, nor bake his bread elsewhere
than in the nobleman’s oven.
These monopolies were peculiar to the lord, and the peasant must pay toll
lest the lord’s revenues decrease.
The peasant could not vote, had really no civic existence, was not
considered in the government of the country; could be made to work
whether he wished to do so or not for the noble and the king. His horses
could be taken from the cart, or from the plow, if his superiors
demanded it. Neither for his labor nor his horse was he paid. He could
not put salt into his victuals without paying a high price for it, and he
was not allowed to eat his victuals unsalted. The law _compelled_ him to
buy a certain portion of salt every year at an exorbitant price.
The church took from him one-tenth of all he made, besides which he must
pay fees for christenings, marriages, burials and pardons for sins—to say
nothing of prayers in behalf of the living, the dying and the dead. The
feudal lord took from him annually a certain part of all he made.
The French historian Taine says that in some portions of France the
peasant paid in feudal dues, church tithes and royal taxes _more than
three-fourths of all that he made_. In other portions of France _the
entire net produce of the soil went to the church and state_, and so
great was the intolerable burden that _the peasants quit in despair, left
the land to become a desert waste, and flocked to the cities to swell the
army of The Wretched_.
To throw off the shackles of this frightful system of misgovernment the
French Revolutionist roused the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account