Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
History
Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
Peace; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
The Conference at Algeciras was an international legislature in which
even the United States was represented; the London Conference after the
Balkan wars was a gathering of ambassadors trying to legislate out of
existence the sources of European trouble in the Balkans. But all these
legislatures have had one great fault. They met, they passed laws, they
adjourned, and left the enforcement of their mandate to the conscience
of the individual Powers. The legislature was international, but the
executive was merely national. The legislature moreover had no way of
checking up or controlling the executive. The representatives of all
the nations would pass laws for the government of weak territories, but
the translation of those laws into practise was left to the colonial
bureaucrats of some one nation.
If the law was not carried out, to whom would an appeal be made? Not to
the Conference, for it had ceased to exist. There was no way in which
a European legislature could recall the officials who did not obey
its will. Those officials were responsible to their home government,
although they were supposed to be executing a European mandate. Those
who were injured had also to appeal to their home government, and the
only way to remedy an abuse or even sift out the truth of an allegation
was by negotiation between the Powers. This raised the question of their
sovereignty, called forth patriotic feeling, revived a thousand memories,
and made any satisfactory interpretation of the European Act or any
criticism of its administration a highly explosive adventure.
Suppose, for example, that Congress had power to pass laws, but that
the execution of them was left to the States. Suppose New York had its
own notions of tariff administration. How would the other States compel
the New York customs officials to execute the spirit and letter of
the Federal law? Suppose every criticism by Pennsylvania of a New York
Collector was regarded as an infringement of New York’s sovereignty, as
a blow at New York’s pride, what kind of chaos would we suffer from? Yet
that is the plight of our world society.
[Sidenote: An international Senate for each arena of friction.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account