Traitor or patriot? : $b A tale of the Rye-House PlotRowsell, Mary C. (Mary Catherine)
History
Traitor or patriot? : $b A tale of the Rye-House Plot
Rowsell, Mary C. (Mary Catherine)
Great Britain -- History -- Charles II, 1660-1685 -- Fiction; Rye House Plot, 1683 -- Fiction
One reason for this among divers others, was their difference of
opinion concerning the sign of her hostelry. What easier, the
maltster always insisted, than to change it from the "King's Arms" to
the "Commonwealth Arms?" or some such reasonable name? There could
be no offence, he argued, to anybody in that. But Mistress Sheppard
maintained there was, and much offence too. She would stand by and
see no such senseless choppings and changings. There had never been
anything common about the place, since place it was; and shouldn't be
while she was above ground. And what did the man want of such
notions? And Master Sheppard, if he could have answered that
question, as perhaps he might, maintained a discreet silence, as
indeed is the only safe course when one finds one's self betwixt two
stools, as his lot in life placed him; for he was never certain
whether he stood more in awe of his wife or of Master Rumbold. Once,
it is true, he ventured so far as to hint to her, that for the good
of the house, and the sake of peace, it might be well to think over
Master Rumbold's suggestion, and that he, Sheppard, was agreeable, if
so be--but having got thus far he was pulled up by Mistress Sheppard,
who said she "was not agreeable; that those who didn't like the sign
might spare their custom, and the good o' the house'd be none the
worse for lack o' their company." And so the sign remained true to
its colours, and an eyesore and a thorn in the flesh to roundhead
Master Rumbold.
[Sidenote: Smouldering fires.]
Differences between neighbours were, however, unfortunately common
enough in those troubled times; for troubled they were. It is true
that the old quarrel between the king and the parliament, which had
brought Charles the First to his sad death at Whitehall, had been
patched up very neatly more than twenty years ago now, when his son,
King Charles the Second, had been restored to the throne; but the
feelings of the people were like smouldering fires, and ready as ever
to break out in discontent. The country, moreover, was divided, not
now, as then, into those who did approve of its being governed by a
king and those who did not; but there were many loyal enough
sober-minded folks, and holding quite varying forms of religious
belief, who were sorely disappointed with the manner in which the
king, whom they had helped to restore with so much expense of
precious lives and of money, governed; or, more properly, neglected
to govern. Yes, a careless "Merry Monarch"--all very well to call
him so--but your merry men and women are frequently cruelly selfish
ones, and contrive to bring tears into other people's eyes every time
they are pleased to laugh.
Then, too, there were many who dreaded the day when Charles's
brother, the Duke of York, should succeed him on the throne. There
seemed hardly any doubt that he had adopted the Roman Catholic form
of belief; and a strong impression prevailed that Charles was also
greatly inclined to do the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Traitor or patriot? : $b A tale of the Rye-House Plot — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account