Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
After the construction of the sand-walls was discontinued, the space
behind the bench-walls, between the neat line and the rock, was filled
with rock packing, which was generally built, part way up at least, as a
dry wall ahead of the construction of the bench-wall, or it was put in
place simultaneously with the concrete, care being taken to keep it as
free as possible for the drainage of any water there might be. Toward
the latter part of the work, owing to the difficulty of getting
sufficient rock packing during the day, a rough back form for the
bench-wall was built at the neat line, in places where the section was
at all large, and the space was filled with rock afterward, generally at
night or on Sundays.
In the sections where water-proofing was required, where no sand-wall
was built, the rock was taken out for 2 ft. outside the neat line,
if the excavation was not already that far out (at the expense of the
contractors, who preferred to do this rather than build the sand-walls
for the short sections required), so that there would be sufficient room
for placing the water-proofing on the back of the bench-walls, as shown
by Fig. 18, _E_. The water-proofing of these sections was left until
just before the arch was to be built, and after being placed it was
protected by a single row of brick laid on edge before the rock packing
was filled in.
_Arches._--The centering used for the arches is shown very clearly in
Fig. 4, Plate XXV, which is a view of the back end of the first section
built at Weehawken. In this part of the tunnel, the lower part of the
arch, about 5 ft. above the bench-wall, was built first, as previously
referred to, but the centers, as will be seen, were built so that they
could be used for the whole of the arch. The forward bulkhead, and the
shoveling platform on a section being built, are shown in Fig. 3, Plate
XXVI.
The front bulkheads used were made in nine sections, bolted to a 2½ by
2½-in. angle bent to the radius of the arch, as shown in Fig. 3, Plate
XXVI, and fitting on the end of the lagging; when set they were braced
partly against the rock of the roof and partly against the gantry. After
the ribs and part of the lagging had been set by the night gang for a
fresh section of arch, the braces holding the bulkheads were knocked
out, the concrete placed during the day having set sufficiently by this
time; the whole of the bulkhead was then easily moved ahead, sliding
along the lagging to the forward end, and made ready for the next day’s
work. The middle section at the top was taken out temporarily, to
facilitate working at the sides, until it was needed.
The traveling gantry used in handling the concrete for the arch is shown
in Fig. 1, Plate XXVI, which also shows the form for the circuit-breaker
chamber, and a car of rock packing on the track beneath.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account