Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXX, Dec. 1910: Federal Investigations of Mine Accidents, Structural Materials and Fuels. Paper No. 1171 — John Shaqi
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXX, Dec. 1910: Federal Investigations of Mine Accidents, Structural Materials and Fuels. Paper No. 1171Wilson, Herbert M. (Herbert Michael)
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXX, Dec. 1910: Federal Investigations of Mine Accidents, Structural Materials and Fuels. Paper No. 1171
Wilson, Herbert M. (Herbert Michael)
Building materials; Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Coal mines and mining -- Safety measures; Fuel
“It may be wise to point out in this connection certain differences
between the permissible explosives as a class and the black powders
now so generally used in coal mining, as follows:
“(_a_) With equal quantities of each, the flame of the black powder is
more than three times as long and has a duration three thousand to
more than four thousand times that of one of the permissible
explosives, also the rate of explosion is slower.
“(_b_) The permissible explosives are one and one-fourth to one and
three-fourths times as strong and are said, if properly used, to do
twice the work of black powder in bringing down coal; hence only half
the quantity need be used.
“(_c_) With 1 pound of a permissible explosive or 2 pounds of black
powder, the quantity of noxious gases given off from a shot averages
approximately the same, the quantity from the black powder being less
than from some of the permissible explosives and slightly greater than
from others. The time elapsing after firing before the miner returns
to the working face or fires another shot should not be less for
permissible explosives than for black powder.
“The use of permissible explosives should be considered as
supplemental to and not as a substitute for other safety precautions
in mines where gas or inflammable coal dust is present under
conditions indicative of danger. As stated above, they should be used
with strong detonators; and the charge used in practice should not
exceed 1½ pounds, and in many cases need not exceed 1 pound.
“Inasmuch as no explosive manufactured for use in mining is flameless,
and as no such explosive is entirely safe under all the variable
mining conditions, the use of the terms ‘flameless’ and ‘safety’ as
applied to explosives is likely to be misunderstood, may endanger
human life, and should be discouraged.
“JOSEPH A. HOLMES,
“_Expert in Charge Technologic Branch_.
“Approved, May 18, 1909:
“GEO. OTIS SMITH,
“_Director_.”
In the meantime, many of the explosives submitted, which heretofore had
been on the market as safety explosives, were found to be unsafe for
use in gaseous or dusty mines, and the manufacturers were permitted
to withdraw them. Their weaknesses being known, as a result of these
tests, the manufacturers were enabled to produce similar, but safer,
explosives. Consequently, applications for further tests continued
to pour in, as they still do, and on October 1st, 1909, a second list
of permissible explosives was issued, as follows:
“EXPLOSIVES CIRCULAR NO. 2.
“DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.
“United States Geological Survey.
“October 1, 1909.
“LIST OF PERMISSIBLE EXPLOSIVES.
“Tested prior to October 1, 1909.
“The following list of permissible explosives tested by the United
States Geological Survey at Pittsburg, Pa., is hereby published for
the benefit of operators, mine owners, mine inspectors, miners, and
others interested.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account