Transcendentalism in New England: A HistoryFrothingham, Octavius Brooks
Philosophy
Transcendentalism in New England: A History
Frothingham, Octavius Brooks
Transcendentalism (New England)
"In Schelling's _Natur Philosophie_ and the _System des
Transcendentalen Idealismus_, I first found a genial coincidence
with much that I had toiled out for myself, and a powerful
assistance in what I had yet to do. All the main and fundamental
ideas were born and matured in my mind before I had ever seen a
single page of the German philosopher; and I might indeed affirm
with truth, before the more important works of Schelling had been
written, or at least made public. Nor is this at all to be wondered
at. We had studied in the same school; been disciplined by the same
preparatory philosophy, namely, the writings of Kant; we had both
equal obligations to the polar logic and dynamic philosophy of
Giordano Bruno; and Schelling has lately, and, as of recent
acquisition, avowed that same affectionate reverence for the labors
of Behmen and other mystics which I had formed at a much earlier
period. God forbid that I should be suspected of a wish to enter
into a rivalry with Schelling for the honors so unequivocally his
right, not only as a great original genius, but as the _founder_ of
the Philosophy of Nature, and as the most successful _improver_ of
the Dynamic system, which, begun by Bruno, was reintroduced (in a
more philosophical form, and freed from all its impurities and
visionary accompaniments) by Kant, in whom it was the native and
necessary growth of his own system. Kant's followers, however, on
whom (for the greater part) their master's _cloak_ had fallen,
without, or with a very scanty portion of his _spirit_, had adopted
his dynamic ideas, only as a more refined species of mechanics.
With exception of one or two fundamental ideas which cannot be
withheld from Fichte, to Schelling we owe the completion and the
most important victories of this revolution in philosophy. To me it
will be happiness and honor enough, should I succeed in rendering
the system itself intelligible to my countrymen, and in the
application of it to the most awful of subjects for the most
important of purposes. Whether a work is the offspring of a man's
own spirit and the product of original thinking, will be discovered
by those who are its sole legitimate judges, by better tests than
the mere reference to dates."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account