Travels in Central Asia: Being the Account of a Journey from Teheran Across the Turkoman Desert on the Eastern Shore of the Caspian to Khiva, Bokhara, and SamarcandVámbéry, Ármin
History
Travels in Central Asia: Being the Account of a Journey from Teheran Across the Turkoman Desert on the Eastern Shore of the Caspian to Khiva, Bokhara, and Samarcand
Vámbéry, Ármin
Asia, Central -- Description and travel; Vámbéry, Ármin, 1832-1913 -- Travel -- Asia, Central
[Footnote 136: Appian mentions (De Rebus Syriacis, lvii.) many
cities founded by the Greeks and by Seleucus, amongst others one
[Greek text], of which Pliny (vi. 16) seems to speak when he says:
'Ultra Sogdiana, oppidum Tarada, et in ultimis eorum finibus
Alexandria ab Alexandro magno conditum.' That point or its vicinity
seems to have marked the extreme limit of progress on that side of
all the great conquerors of classical antiquity; for there, says
Pliny, were altars placed by Hercules, Bacchus, Cyrus, Semiramis,
and Alexander: 'Finis omnium eorum ductus ab illâ parte terrarum,
includente flumine Jaxarte, quod Scythae Silin vocant.' And indeed
with respect to the city 'Alexandreschata' Arrian (_Exped. Alexand_.
1. iv. c. i. 3, and c. iv. 10), agrees with Pliny, telling us that
this great hero intended it as a barrier against the people on the
further bank of the river, and colonised it with Macedonian
veterans, Greek mercenaries, and such of the adjacent barbarians as
were so disposed. This city was built on the banks of the Jaxartes,
and most consider it to be the modern Khodjend. What if Oosh should
have been the spot where stood the columns of Alexander (_Curtius_,
vii. 6)? And yet the supposition that Alexander firmly possessed
himself of any land beyond the Jaxartes is hardly consistent with
the account of Arrian. Curtius (1. vii. 9) describes the remains of
the altars of Bacchus as 'monuments consisting of stones arranged at
numerous intervals, and eight lofty trees with their stems covered
with ivy.']
{387}
With respect to the political position of the Khanat of Khokand, its
independence dates as far back as that of Bokhara and Khiva. The
present reigning family pretends to descend in a direct line from
Djenghis Khan, which is very improbable, as his family was dethroned
by Timour; and after Baber, the last descendant of Timour in Khokand,
the Sheïbani, as well as other chieftains from the races Kiptchak and
Kirghis, seized alternately the reins of government. The family at
present on the throne, or perhaps, I should rather say, now disputing
its claim to it with Bokhara, is of Kiptchak origin, and has only been
80 years at the head of affairs. The institutions in Khokand bear very
slight traces of Arabian or Persian elements, and the Yaszao Djenghis
(code of Djenghis) is the legal authority which they follow. Here also
a singular ceremonial deserves notice. The Khan at his coronation is
raised in the air upon a white felt, and shoots arrows to the north,
south, east, and west. [Footnote 137]
[Footnote 137: It is singular that this custom exists even in the
present day at the coronation of kings in Hungary. The king on the
Hill of Coronation, on horseback, and invested with all the insignia
of royalty, is required to brandish his sword respectively to the
four points of the compass.]
{388}
A.
THE WAR BETWEEN BOKHARA AND KHOKAND IN THE TIME OF THE EMIR NASRULLAH.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account