Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
Tor may be known at a distance by two hills that stand near the water
side, which, in clear weather, may be seen six leagues off. Just to
the south-east of these is the town and harbour, where there are
some palm-trees about the houses, the more remarkable, that they are
the first you see on the coast. There is no danger in going into Tor
harbour, the soundings in the way are clean and regular; and by giving
the beacon a small birth on the larboard hand, you may haul in a little
to the northward, and anchor in five or six fathom. The bottom of the
bay is not a mile from the beacon, and about the same distance from the
opposite shore. There is no sensible tide in the middle of the Gulf,
but, by the sides, it runs full two knots an hour. At springs, it is
high water at Tor nearly at twelve o’clock.
On the 9th we arrived at Tor, a small straggling village, with
a convent of Greek Monks, belonging to Mount Sinai. Don John de
Castro[167] took this town when it was walled, and fortified, soon
after the discovery of the Indies by the Portuguese; it has never since
been of any consideration. It serves now, only as a watering-place for
ships going to, and from Suez. From this we have a distinct view of the
points of the mountains Horeb and Sinai, which appear behind and above
the others, their tops being often covered with snow in winter.
There are three things, (now I am at the north end of the Arabian
Gulf,) of which the reader will expect some account, and I am heartily
sorry to say, that I fear I shall be obliged to disappoint him in all,
by the unsatisfactory relation I am forced to give.
The first is, Whether the Red Sea is not higher than the Mediterranean,
by several feet or inches? To this I answer, That the fact has been
supposed to be so by antiquity, and alledged as a reason why Ptolemy’s
canal was made from the bottom of the Heroopolitic Gulf, rather than
brought due north across the Isthmus of Suez; in which last case, it
was feared it would submerge a great part of Asia Minor. But who has
ever attempted to verify this by experiment? or who is capable of
settling the difference of levels, amounting, as supposed, to some feet
and inches, between two points 120 miles distant from each other, over
a desert that has no settled surface, but is changing its height every
day? Besides, since all seas are, in fact, but one, what is it that
hinders the Indian Ocean to flow to its level? What is it that keeps
the Indian Ocean up?
Till this last branch of the question is resolved, I shall take it for
granted that no such difference of level exists, whatever Ptolemy’s
engineers might have pretended to him; because, to suppose it fact, is
to suppose the violation of one very material law of nature.
The next thing I have to take notice of, for the satisfaction of my
reader, is, the way by which the children of Israel passed the Red Sea
at the time of their deliverance from the land of Egypt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account