Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
Jeremiah[254] speaks of the chiefs of the mingled people that dwell
in the deserts. And Ezekiel[255] also mentions them independent of
all the others, whether Shepherds, or Cushites, or Libyans their
neighbours, by the name of the Mingled People. Isaiah[256] calls them
“a nation scattered and peeled; a people terrible from their beginning
hitherto; a nation meted out and trodden down, whose land the rivers
have spoiled:” which is a sufficient description of them, as having
been expelled their own country, and settled in one that had suffered
greatly by a deluge a short time before.
CHAP. III.
_Origin of Characters or Letters--Ethiopic the first
Language--How and why the Hebrew Letter was formed._
The reader will observe what I have already said concerning the
language of Habesh, or the Mingled Nations, that they have not
characters of their own; but when written, which is very seldom, it
must be by using the Geez alphabet. Kircher, however, says, there are
two characters to be found in Abyssinia; one he calls the Sacred Old
Syrian, the other the Vulgar, or Common Geez character, of which we are
now speaking. But this is certainly a mistake; there never was, that I
know, but two original characters which obtained in Egypt. The first
was the Geez, the second the Saitic, and both these were the oldest
characters in the world, and both derived from hieroglyphics.
Although it is impossible to avoid saying something here of the origin
of languages, the reader must not expect that I should go very deep
into the fashionable opinions concerning them, or believe that all
the old deities of the Pagan nations were the patriarchs of the Old
Testament. With all respect to Sanchoniatho and his followers, I can
no more believe that Osiris, the first king of Egypt, was a real
personage, and that Tot was his secretary, than I can believe Saturn
to be the patriarch Abraham, and Rachel and Leah, Venus and Minerva. I
will not fatigue the reader with a detail of useless reasons; if Osiris
is a real personage, if he was king of Egypt, and Tot his secretary,
they surely travelled to very good purpose, as all the people of Europe
and Asia seem to be agreed, that in person they first communicated
letters and the art of writing to them, but at very different, and very
distant periods.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account