Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 3 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 3 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
circumcision under the countenance of Azarias, the son of Zadok, the
high priest, and the representatives of the twelve tribes who came with
him at that time from Jerusalem.
It seems to me very extraordinary, that, if circumcision was originally
a Jewish invention, all those nations to the south should be absolutely
ignorant of it, while others to the northward were so early acquainted
with it; for none of those nations up the Nile (excepting the
Shepherds) either know or practise it to this day; though, ever since
the 1400th year before Christ, they have been in the closest connection
with the Jews. This would rather make me believe, that the rite of
circumcision went northward from the plain of Mamrè, for it certainly
made no progress southward from Egypt. We see it obtained in Arabia, by
Zipporah[106], Moses’s wife, circumcising her son upon their return to
Egypt. Her great anxiety to have that operation immediately performed,
shews that her’s was a Judaical circumcision; there was no sin that
attended the omission of this operation in Egypt, but God had said to
Abraham[107], “The soul that is not circumcised shall be cut off from
Israel.”
The Tcheratz Agows, who live between Lasta and Begemder, in an
exceedingly fertile country, are not circumcised; and, therefore, if
this nation left Palestine upon Joshua passing Jordan, circumcision
was not known there, for the Agows to this day are uncircumcised. The
same may be said of the Agows of Damot, who are settled at the head
of the Nile. It will be seen by the two specimens of their different
languages that they are different nations, as I have alledged. Next
to these are the Gafat, in a plain open country, who do not use
circumcision; none of them were ever converted to Judaism, and but few
of them to Christianity. The next are the people of Amhara who did not
use circumcision, at least few of them, till after the massacre of the
princes by Judith in the year 900, when the remaining princes of the
line of Solomon fled to Shoa, and the court was established there. The
last of these nations that I shall mention are the Galla, who are not
circumcised; of this nation we have said enough.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account