Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 3 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 3 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
On the north, a black, woolly-headed nation, called the Shangalla,
already often mentioned, bounds Abyssinia, and serves like a string to
the bow made by these nations of Galla. Who they are we know perfectly,
being the Cushite Troglodytes of Sofala, Saba, Axum and Meroë; shut up,
as I have already mentioned, in those caves, the first habitations of
their more polished ancestors. Neither do these circumcise, though they
immediately bordered upon Egypt, while the Cushite, adjoining to the
peninsula of Africa certainly did. As then so many nations contiguous
to Egypt never received circumcision from it, it seems an invincible
argument, that this was no endemial rite or custom among the Egyptians,
and I have before observed, that it was of no use to this nation,
as the reasons mentioned by Philo, and the rest, of cleanliness and
climate, are absolute dreams, and now, exploded; and that they are so
is plain, because, otherwise, the nations more to the southward would
have adopted it, as they have universally done another custom, which I
shall presently speak of.
Circumcision, then, having no natural cause or advantage, being in
itself repugnant to man’s nature, and extremely painful, if not
dangerous, it could never originate in man’s mind wantonly and out
of free-will. It might have done so indeed from imitation, but with
Abraham it had a cause, as God was to make his private family in a few
years numerous, like the sands of the sea. This mark, which separated
them from all the world, was an easy way to shew whether the promise
was fulfilled or not. They were going to take possession of a land
where circumcision was not known, and this shewed them their enemy
distinct from their own people. And it would be the grossest absurdity
to send Samson to bring, as tokens of the slain, so many foreskins or
prepuces of the Philistines, if, as Herodotus says, the Philistines had
cut off their prepuces a thousand years before.
I must here take notice that this custom, filthy and barbarous as it
is, has been adopted by the Abyssinians of Tigrè, who have always been
circumcised, from a knowledge that the nations about them were not
circumcised at all. It is true they do not content themselves with the
foreskin, and I doubt very much if this was not the case with the Jews
likewise. On the contrary, in place of the foreskin they cut the whole
away, scrotum and all, and bring this to their superiors, as a token
they have killed an enemy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account