Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 4 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 4 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
Achmet seemed, by strange accident, to be one of the gentlest spirits
of any that it was my misfortune to converse with at Sennaar. He was
very little attached to, or convinced of, the truth of the Mahometan
religion, and as little zealous or instructed in his own. He used
often to qualify his ignorance, or disbelief, by saying, that any, or
no religion, was better than that of a Christian. His place of birth
was in a village of Fazuclo, and it appeared to me that he was still a
Pagan. He was constantly attended by Nuban priests, powerful conjurers
and sorcerers, if you believed him. I often conversed with these in
great freedom, when it happened they understood Arabic, and from them
I learned many particulars concerning the situation of the inland
part of the country, especially that vast ridge of mountains, Dyre
and Tegla, which run into the heart of Africa to the westward, whence
they say anciently they came, after having been preserved there from
a deluge. I asked them often, (powerful as they were in charms), Why
they did not cure Achmet of the gravel, or epilepsy? Their answer was,
That it was a Christian devil, and not subject to their power.
Achmet did not believe that I was a Christian, knew I was no
Mahometan, but thought I was like himself, something between the two,
nor did I ever undeceive him. I was no missionary, nor had I any care
of souls, nor desire to enter into conversation about religion with
a man whose only office was to be the deliberate murderer of his
sovereign. He spoke good Arabic, was offended at no question, but
answered freely, and without reserve, whether about the country,
religion, or government, or the post which he enjoyed, if we can term
it _enjoying_ an office created for such horrid crimes. He told me,
with great coolness, in answer to a question why he murdered Nasser's
son in his father's presence, that he did not dare to do otherwise
from duty to Nasser, whose right it was to see his son slain in a
regular and lawful manner, and this was by cutting his throat with a
sword, and not by a more ignominious and painful death, which, if it
had not been done in the father's sight, the vengeance of his enemies
might have suggested and inflicted. He said, that Nasser was very
little concerned at the spectacle of his son's death, but very loth
when it came to his turn to die himself; that he urged him often to
suffer him to escape, but, finding this in vain, he submitted without
resistance. He told me, Ismain, the present king, stood upon very
precarious ground; that both the brothers, Adelan and Abou Kalec, were
at the head of armies in the field; that Kittou had at his disposal
all the forces that were in Sennaar; and that the king was little
esteemed, and had neither experience, courage, friends, money, nor
troops.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account