Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physicChristison, Robert, Sir
Science
Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physic
Christison, Robert, Sir
Medical jurisprudence; Toxicology
The characters of the crust have been mentioned already under the head
of fly-powder (p. 199). They are distinct even in crusts weighing only a
300th of a grain. A crust of this weight, a tenth of an inch broad and
four times as long, may show characteristically all the physical
characters of an arsenical sublimate a hundred times larger.
The fallacies to which the test has been supposed to be liable
(excluding at present that part of it which consists in the oxidation of
the metal, and which renders it quite unimpeachable), are the
following.— Dr. Paris says he has known an instance where a person, “by
no means deficient in chemical address, mistook for it a deposit of
charcoal,”[510] and I have known the same mistake happen in the hands of
one of my pupils, a beginner in the study of medico-legal chemistry. The
outer surface of a charcoal crust may be mistaken for arsenic by a
careless person; but with ordinary care it is quite impossible to err if
the inner surface be examined, for that of charcoal is brown, powdery,
and perfectly dull.—It has been suggested to me and has been stated in
print,[511] that the preparations of antimony yield by reduction a
sublimate resembling closely an arsenical crust. But in consequence of
repeated trials I am certain that no preparation of antimony, reduced
either by charcoal or the black flux with the fullest red heat of the
blowpipe will yield any metallic sublimate; and the same facts were
observed by the late Dr. Turner.—It has even been said by Mr. Donovan
that the action of the flux on glass which contains lead causes a stain
similar to an arsenical crust.[512] If it be meant by this observation,
that the lead contained in the glass usually gives that part of the tube
which contains the flux a glimmering appearance and impairs its
transparency, the author is correct: but it is impossible that a
sublimate can be so formed.—Dr. Mitchell of Philadelphia in an elaborate
paper on the process of reduction seems to consider the crust
undistinguishable from that formed in similar circumstances by
cinnabar.[513] Crusts of cinnabar, however, do not present the peculiar
character possessed by the internal surface of arsenic.—Zinc, it is
said, may be sublimed in its metallic state; but the sublimation of zinc
requires a full white heat; which in the process for arsenic cannot be
generated.—Tellurium, cadmium, and potassium sublime at a lower heat;
but these metals are so exceedingly rare, that it is quite unnecessary
to particularize the characters of their sublimates.—Lastly, it is said
that a crust may be produced from arsenic contained in the glass of the
tube. A few years ago MM. Ozanam and Idt of Lyons detected arsenic in
the remains of a body which had been seven years interred; but
subsequently M. Idt imagined he had discovered that the glass used in
the analysis contained arsenic, and yielded it by the process of
reduction. He accordingly retracted his original opinion; and the person
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account