49. An important question in the history of the vascular system of the mucous membranes presents itself, which is, does this system admit more or less blood, according to its various circumstances? As the organs within which this sort of membrane is spread are nearly all of them susceptible of contraction and dilatation, as is observable in the stomach, intestines, bladder, &c., it has been believed, that during their dilatation the vessels, being more spread out, received more blood, and that during their contraction, on the contrary, being folded on themselves, and as it were strangulated, they admitted but a small portion of this fluid, which then flows back into the adjacent organs. M. Chaussier has applied these principles to the stomach, the circulation of which he has considered as being alternately the inverse of that of the omentum, which receives, during the vacuity of that organ, the blood which it, being in a state of contraction, cannot admit. Since M. Lieutaud, an analogous use has been attributed to the spleen. Observe what I have ascertained on this subject from the inspection of animals opened during abstinence, and in the various periods of digestion. 50. (1) Whilst the stomach is in a state of repletion its vessels are more apparent on its exterior surface than during its vacuity; its mucous surface at this time has no higher degree of redness, but it has sometimes appeared to me to be less red than when the viscus was empty. (2) The omentum, being less extended during the plenitude of the stomach, presents nearly the same number of apparent vessels, equal in length, but more folded upon themselves than during the vacuity of that organ[C]. If they are then less loaded with blood the difference is scarcely perceptible. I would here observe, that great care is requisite in opening the animal, or the blood will fall upon the omentum, and prevent us from ascertaining its real state. (3) I am confident that there is no such constant relation between the volume of the spleen and the stomach in its different states of vacuity or plenitude; and if that organ increases and diminishes under various circumstances, it is not always in the inverse ratio of the state of the stomach. Like Lieutaud, I at first made experiments on dogs, in order to satisfy myself respecting the facts just stated; but the inequality in the size and age of those which were brought to me leading me to fear that I might not be able to compare their spleens correctly, I repeated them on Guinea pigs, whose size and condition corresponded, and examined, at the same time, some whilst the stomach was empty, and others whilst it was full. I have almost always found the volume of the spleen nearly equal, or at least the difference has not been very perceptible. Nevertheless, in other experiments I have seen the spleen, under various circumstances, to show variations in its volume, but more particularly in weight;