Treatment of Cholera in the Royal Hospital, Haslar: during the months of July and August, 1849, with remarks on the name and origin of the disease.Wilson, John (Inspector of Naval Hospitals)
History
Treatment of Cholera in the Royal Hospital, Haslar: during the months of July and August, 1849, with remarks on the name and origin of the disease.
Wilson, John (Inspector of Naval Hospitals)
Cholera
humanity; thus, at the same time, supplying one of the most powerful
predisposing causes of the disease, and fearfully augmenting the misery
and danger of the affected. In such a state of things it would be
impossible to persuade persons of character, like those who, without
hesitation, undertook the duty of nursing the choleral patients in
Haslar, to enter on similar service for eighteen-pence a day; nay, it
might be impossible to persuade men to enter on such a forlorn hope by
any consideration.
Although the pro-contagionist might not be moved by facts and inferences
like these, he would perhaps be disposed to ask the man propounding them,
some such question as the following.—As you do not admit that contagion
is the cause of cholera, what in your opinion is the cause? In return it
would not be impertinent to say to the querist, what is the cause of
ague? Something emanating from the surface of the earth, on the spot, or
not far from the place where its subjects are resident?—something so
subtle as to be imperceptible by the senses, and hitherto beyond the
scrutiny of chemists and meteorologists. He would, it is presumed,
answer in some such terms, or if he attempted any much more precise and
instructive, he would proceed without the warrant of fact and experience.
Such at least would be the general reply of the profession, and a more
complete and unconditional confession of ignorance of every thing
respecting the essence of a most powerful and wide spread cause of
disease cannot be made. Though we know a good deal of the places most
prolific in its production, as well as of the agents which co-operatively
increase its force, we know it solely by its effects.
In very similar, if not precisely the same terms, it seems to the writer,
should the question, what is the cause of cholera, be answered. Little,
if anything more can be affirmed respecting its origin, but almost every
thing authentic in its history, progress, and phenomena, testify to its
having a local source, and generally very limited scope of operation.
Thus it appears simultaneously in different, distant places, leaving
intermediate places untouched. It attacks in one town a particular
district, street, or portion of street, beyond which it does not travel.
In another town it shows itself among distant portions of the
inhabitants, leaving long spaces unscathed. Again, while one town
suffers severely from it, another in the neighbourhood has not a single
case then, or thereafter; or the town which escapes this season, falls
fatally under its sway the next, when all the rest of the country is
clear. These and such circumstances as these, point as clearly as it is
possible to point at the endemic source of cholera, although the
_essential_ cause of the disease cannot be ascertained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account