Treatment of hemorrhoids, and other non-malignant rectal diseasesAgnew, W. P. (William Penn)
Science
Treatment of hemorrhoids, and other non-malignant rectal diseases
Agnew, W. P. (William Penn)
Hemorrhoids; Rectum -- Diseases
The case of a lady recently came under my observation, who, although
in average health, complained a little as many women do, and thought
she was troubled with hemorrhoids. Through the advice of her physician,
a college professor, she submitted to the operation of stretching on
general principles. Irritability of the rectum followed, with soreness
and continued pain. Finally two large sympathetic buboes developed, which
suppurated, and were slow in healing. This happened a little over a year
ago, I am reliably informed, and she has not yet fully recovered.
A number of cases have come to my notice where stretching was practiced
for the cure of piles, imaginary spasmodic stricture, etc., without the
least benefit, except, possibly, that accruing to the physician.
[Illustration: FIG. 30.—Graduated Rectal Dilators. (Pratt’s).]
A young married man, foreman of a printing-office, complained at times
of slight pain in the region of the liver. His physician, an editor of
a medical journal, made an examination of the rectum with a speculum,
and informed him that it would be necessary, to preserve his health, to
undergo the operation of stretching the sphincters.
The day was appointed and hour set for the operation, which, fortunately
for the young man, was “nipped in the bud” by the physicians arriving a
little late; and through the advice of a friend he seized the opportunity
and “skipped out,” came to my office, and was examined. His bowels were
regular, there was no history of rectal disease, and not the least sign
of any; nor was there a shadow of an excuse for an operation.
The cases in which divulsion seems to be of greatest benefit are found
mostly among women of a peculiar high nervous tension or organization,
where the muscles become hypertrophied from repeated spasm, and
constipation resulting from ineffectual efforts to expel the feces. In
such cases forced dilitation is followed by the most satisfactory results.
It should be accomplished with patient lying on the side, and under the
most profound anæsthesia. Rectal dilators, which distribute the force
evenly all around, may first be used, then the thumbs, or the thumb of
right hand and index finger of the left, or two fingers of each hand, to
completely paralyze the muscles. The process should be slow and gentle,
and caution exercised lest the tissue give way from the application of
undue force.
Local causes should always be sought, and excluded if practical, before
heroic measures are adopted for the relief of spasmodic sphincter. There
are instances where tightness of the sphincters exist, superinducing
constipation, etc., not traceable to any appreciable cause. These cases
may be relieved without the aid of general anæsthesia, by graduated
dilators or rectal bougies, accomplishing little at a time, daily or
tri-weekly.
When constipation depends upon inertia, or a lack of expulsive power
of the rectum, I think moderate dilitation advisable and decidedly
beneficial.
POLYPUS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account