Had John Brown’s conviction proceeded upon a jury trial in Scotland, I
would have been of a different opinion. There are, in the first place,
several texts in the civil law upon this topic, all clearly purporting
that a remission, so far from restoring, even blemished, the reputation
of him whom it relieved from punishment. Next, our municipal law is
perfectly explicit to the same effect. The statutes of Robert I., among
others therein debarred from giving evidence, mentions convicts redeemed
from justice. This act is expressly quoted and laid down as law by Sir
George Mackenzie, who is, at least, our most ancient author upon the
criminal law, and there is no practice or decision to the contrary.
These observations, however, I do not apply to the present case, for
here the conviction and sentence are from England. The infamy,
therefore, disabling Brown to be a witness arising in the law of that
country, and coming here, must bring its character and construction and
effects along with it.
I observe that one of these effects was the restoring a criminal
pardoned to the state and character that he held previous to the
conviction. The authorities referred to by the Lord Advocate prove this,
and, in addition to these, I shall only mention to your Lordships Mr.
Justice Buller’s Treatise on Trials, a book of great authority, which
lays down that if a person found guilty, on an indictment for perjury at
common law, be pardoned by the King, he will be a good witness, because
the King has power to take off every part of the punishment.
As to the sentence of the Justices of Peace of the county of
Stirlingshire, banishing Brown by his own consent from that county, no
stress can be laid on it, as it is now a settled point that no sentence
of an inferior Court, proceeding without the verdict of a jury, is
sufficient to set aside any person from being a witness.
The LORD JUSTICE-CLERK--My Lords, I will not say a word about the
sentence of the Justices of Peace, nor of what would have been the case
had the crime been committed, or sentence pronounced, in Scotland. I
would hold the decree in England _pro veritate_, and give it effect
accordingly. But, my Lords, if the pardon frees this man from the penal
consequences of his sentence, although I were to hold that it does not
rehabilitate him in Scotland, still it leaves only the _infamia facti_,
for the _infamia juris_ is, _eo ipso_, done away. And, my Lords, nothing
can set aside a witness unless _infamia juris_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account