Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineerDickens Fellowship (London, England)
General
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer
WITNESS: A long time. I remember the clock struck two.
MR. WALTERS: And you went in about midnight?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: You had two hours’ sleep?
WITNESS: Yes, I suppose so.
MR. WALTERS: Anything else? Did you notice anything?
WITNESS: When I woke up, I sees my key on the ground, and
I says, “I dropped you, did I?” So I picks it up, and asks Mister
Jarsper for my bundle.
MR. WALTERS: Did he give it to you?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: I think you had on that occasion a little
conversation about a curious art of yours—tapping the tombs?
WITNESS: Yes; oh, yes—yes.
MR. WALTERS: Would you mind telling the court?
WITNESS: I told him, with my little hammer I could tap and
go on tapping, and I could tell whether anything was solid or whether
it was hollow. For instance, I says, “Tap, tap, old ’un crumbled up
in stone coffin in the vault!”
MR. WALTERS: That’s what you said, is it?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: And what did Mr. Jasper say to that?
WITNESS: He said it was wonderful, and I says, “No; I ain’t
going to take it as a gift, ’cause it’s all out o’ my own head.”
MR. WALTERS: I understand you told him what you could do by
tapping the walls—tell whether it was hollow or solid?
WITNESS: Yes, Durdles can tell whether it’s hollow or solid
by its tap.
MR. WALTERS: Was he interested in your conversation?
WITNESS: Very much, sir.
MR. WALTERS: Did you happen to notice the Sapsea tomb?
WITNESS: Durdles knows the Sapsea tomb.
MR. WALTERS: There is only one body in that tomb at present?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: Did you tap the Sapsea tomb with your hammer,
and did it sound surprising there?
WITNESS: It sounded more solid than usual.
MR. WALTERS: Since then, you have tapped it lately, and it
sounds a little more solid?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. CHESTERTON: This is contrary to an understanding. This
is a formal witness, not to be cross-examined.
MR. WALTERS: Very well, I will go on. (_To witness._) Did
you meet him at another time?
MR. CHESTERTON: This is only formal evidence.
JUDGE: What is the point?
MR. CHESTERTON: You will find before you, my Lord, a
document, and you will find there that certain witnesses who are
to be cross-examined at length will be free to go beyond certain
admitted evidence. The formal witnesses are not to do so.
JUDGE (_after perusing the “Conditions”_): Yes, I think I
take your point, Mr. Chesterman—or Chesterton—whatever it is. The
point, I understand, is that you are cross-examining this witness as
if he were a principal witness of the trial.
MR. CHESTERTON: In the second paragraph I think you will
notice——
MR. WALTERS: It is not of great importance to me.
JUDGE: One moment: I will see. (_After reading the paragraph
referred to._) I think you are justified up to the point to which
you have gone, but I should recommend you to terminate it with some
rapidity.
MR. WALTERS: I only want to ask one question. (_To
witness._) You did have a conversation with Mr. Datchery?
WITNESS: Yes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account