Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineerDickens Fellowship (London, England)
General
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer
MR. WALTERS: When this conversation took place between
you and John Jasper, did it occur to you that he was dazed, as if
suffering from the effect of drugs?
WITNESS: No.
MR. WALTERS: Did it strike you that he was particularly
clear-headed?
WITNESS: I think so. Yes: he was very clear-headed.
MR. WALTERS: Was he concise and clear in his remarks?
WITNESS: Yes, perfectly clear.
MR. WALTERS: If anybody told you he was suffering from the
effect of drugs, or was dazed or bewildered, would your observation
bear that out?
WITNESS: No, indeed.
MR. WALTERS: What did you do in respect of Mr. Neville?
WITNESS: We sent some men after him, and Mr. Jasper and I
followed. Directly we came up with him, Jasper said, “Where is my
nephew?” and Neville said, “Why do you ask me?”
MR. WALTERS: What did Jasper say?
WITNESS: He said, “He was last seen in your company”—or
words to that effect.
MR. WALTERS: When he said that, what sort of impression did
it cause on you? What did you think it meant?
WITNESS: I am sorry to say I had the unpleasant impression
that he meant to suggest that Neville Landless was in some way
responsible for Drood’s disappearance.
MR. WALTERS: Once more he was suggesting murder?
WITNESS: Yes, that was the impression.
MR. WALTERS: And once more suggesting that Neville Landless
was the murderer?
WITNESS: That was so, undoubtedly.
MR. WALTERS: This man, Neville Landless, with this terrible
charge hanging over him; did he come back readily?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: Did he answer any questions put to him?
WITNESS: Quite frankly.
MR. WALTERS: Some time afterwards, you made a discovery, I
think. Would you mind telling the Court what it was?
WITNESS: I was walking along by the river, some two miles
above where these young men had gone for their walk—by the weir, in
fact,—when I saw something shining brightly. Looking more closely,
I thought it was a jewel. I immediately dived in, being fortunately
a good swimmer, and found that it was a gold watch and chain. The
chain was hanging on the timbers. Later I found in the mud a gold
scarf-pin. The watch had the initials E. D. engraved on it.
MR. WALTERS: Did you tell Jasper you had discovered these
things?
WITNESS: At once.
MR. WALTERS: Did he say anything about it?
WITNESS: Nothing at the time, but a few days later, when we
were disrobing in the vestry, he showed me the diary to which I have
alluded.
MR. WALTERS: Did it contain any reference to it?
WITNESS: I cannot charge my memory with the exact words,
but something to this effect—“My poor boy is certainly murdered. The
discovery of the watch and scarf-pin leaves that beyond doubt. They
were no doubt thrown away to prevent identification of the body”—or
words to that effect.
MR. WALTERS: One moment, Mr. Crisparkle. Am I right in
saying that once more Murder was suggested to you?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: And that Neville Landless was pointed to as the
murderer?
WITNESS: Yes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account