Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer — John Shaqi
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineerDickens Fellowship (London, England)
General
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer
MR. CHESTERTON: Had it not been for the fact that you were a
woman, I take it you ask us to believe that you would have written up
in ordinary writing all that you thought and speculated about Jasper
on the cupboard door?
WITNESS: I do not ask you to believe anything of the kind,
for I should not have been so foolish. I could have written some
words if I had wished to, but I would not write at all.
MR. CHESTERTON: You used the old tavern way of keeping
scores. Where did you learn that?
WITNESS: In Ceylon.
MR. CHESTERTON: What is the Cingalese tavern way?
WITNESS: I have not been brought up in a drawing-room, but
among a very rough set of people. My step-father was a low, common
man, and frequented taverns, and we children could go inside and
outside or anywhere.
MR. CHESTERTON: Are there taverns in Ceylon?
WITNESS: I don’t know that they call them taverns.
MR. CHESTERTON: Do you suggest that the phrase “old tavern
way of keeping scores” refers to Ceylon?
WITNESS: My chalk marks revert to the time when I was there.
MR. CHESTERTON: How did you keep scores in Ceylon?
WITNESS: I did not keep scores there, but I saw other people.
MR. CHESTERTON: How do you know how they were kept?
WITNESS: I did not say I did know exactly, but I learned
that a little mark meant a certain quantity, a bigger mark more, and
so on.
MR. CHESTERTON: You like the old tavern way of keeping
scores, but do not know how it is done?
WITNESS: I know that a man that had quarts had large
strokes, and a man that had pints smaller ones.
MR. CHESTERTON: You swear that was done in Ceylon?
WITNESS: I swear that sort of thing was done there.
MR. CHESTERTON: What sort of drinks do they have there?
WITNESS: I never had their drinks. I saw them drinking, but
I did not know what it was. But I saw the scores being kept on the
back of the door.
MR. CHESTERTON: Do you know what they were drinking at all?
WITNESS: I took it for spirits, and beer, and so on.
MR. CHESTERTON: So you knew little about the drinking, but a
great deal about the scoring?
WITNESS: That interested me as a child. My brother and I
used to talk about it.
MR. CHESTERTON: What was the purpose of the scores?
WITNESS: The tavern keepers would do it to know what was due
from Tom Scott, or Jim Price.
MR. CHESTERTON: You told us that you undertook the Datchery
impersonation, so to speak, in collaboration with Mr. Grewgious?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. CHESTERTON: May I take it you know him well?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. CHESTERTON: Frequently correspond with him?
WITNESS: I correspond with him.
MR. CHESTERTON: Receive letters from him?
WITNESS: I have had letters from him.
MR. CHESTERTON: You know his profession?
WITNESS: A lawyer.
MR. CHESTERTON: What sort?
WITNESS: I don’t know.
JUDGE: He is a lawyer, and I think that covers it. He is,
indeed, a particular kind of solicitor, but I think a lady might well
be excused for not knowing that.
MR. WALTERS: A lawyer covers everything.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account