Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer — John Shaqi
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineerDickens Fellowship (London, England)
General
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: It has been suggested that your story is
entirely romance. If you had been acting a part, would you not
naturally have been disgraced for ever in the eyes of all who know
you?
WITNESS: I should indeed.
MR. WALTERS: Have you not a particular reason at present for
wishing to stand high in the esteem of certain people?
WITNESS: I have.
MR. WALTERS: Don’t you think you would forfeit that esteem
if you stood there on your oath, and told a tissue of falsehoods?
WITNESS: I should.
MR. WALTERS: Is there not every reason why you should tell
the truth?
WITNESS: There is.
MR. WALTERS: Have you anything to gain by telling lies?
WITNESS: I have all to lose.
MR. WALTERS: Have you not been working entirely for others
throughout?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. WALTERS: You would not have taken this part if you could
have helped it?
WITNESS: No.
MR. WALTERS: And when you were making these investigations
you did not want to go to everybody and ask his definite
business—“What sort of lawyer are you?”?
WITNESS: No; I never thought about it. He was a lawyer, and
that’s all I knew.
MR. WALTERS: Have you ever written a tragedy that nobody
will bring out?
WITNESS: No, indeed, I have not.
MR. WALTERS: And so you have no particular reason for
standing in the limelight and making yourself a heroine. Thank you.
JUDGE: The Court will now adjourn for about ten or fifteen
minutes.
* * * * *
The Court accordingly adjourned. On the resumption of the
proceedings, Mr. Walters announced that the evidence of Miss Helena
Landless had completed his case.
[THE CASE FOR THE DEFENCE.]
Mr. Crotch, in opening the case for the defence, said—
MY LORD, AND GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY—
I am not going to follow the example of my learned friend, but I am
merely going to outline the defence as briefly as possible. I am
going to say at once that we are not out to attempt to dispute in any
way that the prisoner desired the death of Edwin Drood or that he
intended to murder him, nor that he planned to murder him, nor that
he actually attempted to murder him, nor indeed, my Lord, that at one
time, and for some time, he did believe that he had actually murdered
him. What we do say, however, is that no murder took place. For any
murder there must be, not only a murderer, but a murdered man. Now,
granted for a moment that in the prisoner at the bar you have a
potential murderer, where is the murdered man?
MR. WALTERS: This is strictly against all agreements.
MR. CROTCH: I will put my statement in another way, my Lord.
MR. WALTERS: I draw your attention to this fact: it is
agreed that the legal point that no conviction can take place since
no body has been found, shall be raised only after the retirement of
the jury. This ought not to have been introduced at all.
JUDGE: But we may assume, what is apparently the fact, that
no murdered body has been found?
MR. WALTERS: But he went further, and said, “Where is the
body?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account