6945. What appears to have been the moving cause to induce him to abandon the slave trade?--I have reason to believe that he had for some time contemplated it; but the immediate cause was, that under the blockade he found that he could not follow out the commerce; that he could not get the slaves away. 6946. Mr. _Forster_.] Was the captain cognizant of Mr. Canôt having abandoned the slave trade previously to the landing of the cargo?--He states it himself in his complaint. He states that it was so; that he saw the English flag flying. 6947. Do not you consider that strong proof, that the captain of the Echo was no party to the slave trading transactions going on between the shipper and the consignee?--I can only suppose that the property was Mr. Canôt’s, and that he as an honest man felt himself bound to give it to him. Had it been Pedro Blanco’s own property, sent by him for Mr. Canôt to buy slaves with, I think the property would not have been allowed to be landed. 6948. If the captain had been in the secret as to the transactions between the house at the Havannah and Mr. Canôt, the captain, to protect the house in the Havannah, finding that Mr. Canôt had abandoned the slave trade, would not have delivered the goods?--He was paid for his freight. I suppose he did not care what became of the goods. Had he not landed the goods, he would have had to carry them back; he would have been unable to take freight back. 6949. Mr. _Milnes_.] Was none of the freight landed?--I believe all that was consigned to Mr. Canôt was landed after I sailed. 6950. How would Mr. Canôt have paid for it?--I have no idea how it was paid for. There are three theories to choose amongst; one is, that he robbed his employer’s goods without any set-off; another is, that his employers owed him something equivalent at least to the value of the goods; and the third is, that they were his own property. I refused to enter into the subject with him at all; I had nothing to do with his slave transactions; had it been amenable to seizure I should have seized it. 6951. Captain _Fitzroy_.] Does the slave trade increase or decrease, at the time of the senior officer on the station being changed?--It has generally been observed in the printed correspondence of the commissioners, and also from the observations of the officers on the coast, that the senior officers not having a practical knowledge of the coast, upon their first arrival there the cruizing is much less efficient for a certain time. It requires a long time for an officer to understand the duties of the coast. 6952. You have understood that frequently changing the officers is injurious to the suppression of the slave trade?--Such is my opinion; I think that three years is the proper time for an officer to be employed there. I think the service would suffer if they were removed more frequently.