Trial of the Officers and Crew of the Privateer Savannah, on the Charge of Piracy, in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York — John Shaqi
Trial of the Officers and Crew of the Privateer Savannah, on the Charge of Piracy, in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New YorkWarburton, A. F. (Adolphus Frederick)
History
Trial of the Officers and Crew of the Privateer Savannah, on the Charge of Piracy, in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
Warburton, A. F. (Adolphus Frederick)
Piracy -- United States; Privateering -- United States; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
_Robert Taylor_ called. Challenged for principal cause, by Mr. Smith:
_Q._ In a capital case, where the evidence is sufficient to convince
you of the guilt of the prisoner, have you any conscientious scruples
that would prevent your finding a verdict of guilty?
_A._ No, sir.
_By Mr. Larocque_, for the prisoners:
_Q._ You read of the capture of the privateer Savannah?
_A._ I think I have.
_Q._ Did you form or express any opinion as to the guilt or innocence
of the prisoners?
_A._ Not that I know of, sir.
_Q._ Have you formed or expressed any opinion whether the facts, if
proved, constitute the offence of piracy?
_A._ No, sir, not any.
Challenge withdrawn. _Juror sworn._
_Daniel Bixby_ called. Challenged for principal cause, by Mr. Smith:
_Q._ In a capital case, where the evidence is sufficient to convince
you of the guilt of the prisoner, have you any conscientious scruples
that would prevent your finding a verdict of guilty?
_A._ I have not.
_By Mr. Larocque_:
_Q._ Have you ever formed or expressed any opinion as to the guilt or
innocence of the prisoners?
_A._ I have not.
_Q._ Or whether the facts, if proved, constitute the offence of piracy?
_A._ No, sir.
Challenge withdrawn. _Juror sworn._
_Ira L. Cady_ called. Challenged for principal cause, by Mr. Smith:
_Q._ In a capital case, where the evidence is sufficient to convince
you of the guilt of the prisoner, have you any conscientious scruples
that would prevent your finding a verdict of guilty?
_A._ No, sir.
_By Mr. Larocque_:
_Q._ You know what this case is for?
_A._ I believe I understand it.
_Q._ An indictment of piracy against the privateersmen captured on the
Savannah?
_A._ Yes, sir.
_Q._ Have you formed or expressed any opinion upon the guilt or
innocence of the prisoners?
_A._ I do not recollect that I have.
_Q._ Have you formed or expressed any opinion whether the facts, if
proved, constitute piracy?
_A._ I do not think I have.
_Q._ Have you any opinion now upon either of these subjects?
_A._ I cannot say that I am entirely indifferent of opinion on the
subject, but still I have not formed any definite opinion.
_Q._ Your mind, however, is not entirely unbiased upon the question?
_A._ Well, no, sir--not if I understand the question; that is, the
question whether the facts, if proved, constitute the offence of
piracy?
_Mr. Larocque_ submitted that the juror was not indifferent.
_Mr. Evarts_: All that has been said by the juror is that, on the
question of whether the facts charged constitute the offence of piracy,
he has no fixed opinion; but he cannot say he has no opinion on the
subject. He is ready to receive instruction from the Court.
_Mr. Larocque_ contended that, as the question of whether the facts
alleged constituted piracy, or not, was a most important one to be
discussed, they were entitled to have the mind of the juror entirely
blank and unbiased on that subject.
_The Court_: Let us see what the state of mind of the juror is.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account