Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Weltz testified that a meeting took place in the summer of 1941 on the
occasion of a visit by Generaloberstabsarzt Hippke to Luftgau VII. (_Tr.
p. 7056._) In a discussion between Weltz, Kottenhoff, and Hippke, Hippke
gave his approval in principle to the experiments if they were deemed
necessary. (_Tr. p. 7065._) In the course of the summer of 1941, Rascher
went to Weltz and proposed the slow-ascent experiments, but Weltz turned
them down as unnecessary. (_Tr. p. 7176._) This testimony of the
defendant Weltz clearly indicates the jurisdiction Weltz had over
Rascher’s activities. This refusal to permit the performance of
slow-ascent experiments bears out the contention of the prosecution that
the defendant Weltz had the power and the authority to intervene at any
time. Weltz’ actions throughout the entire development of the plans for
the experiments were not merely negative. He was in full accord with the
entire enterprise and he realized that Rascher did not possess the
necessary qualifications to conduct these experiments without the
assistance of a specialist in this particular field of aviation
medicine. Furthermore, although Rascher was attached to Weltz’ Institute
he had no other definite work. (_Tr. pp. 7078 and 7187._) To find a
specialist to collaborate with Weltz and Rascher proved to be a
difficult task. Weltz first approached members of his own institute,
namely Lutz and Wendt, men of considerable reputation in this field, but
to no avail. Wolfgang Lutz appeared before this Tribunal and testified
that Weltz requested his assistance, as well as the assistance of Wendt,
but that they both refused on moral grounds. (_Tr. p. 269._) Weltz did
not deny this, but contended that his questions to Lutz were purely
rhetorical. (_Tr. p. 7069._)
The inability to interest a specialist in the field of high-altitude
research to collaborate with Rascher explains the cause for the lapse of
time between the date of the authorization by Himmler and the actual
date of the commencement of the experiments, viz, July 1941 to February
1942. Weltz was not a specialist in high-altitude research. Kottenhoff
was transferred to Romania, and Rascher was comparatively a novice in
this field.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account